Apoyo a la Lucha del Pueblo Ecuatoriano 02:33 Jul 29 0 comments Protect Putiki Hikoi Report 08:16 Jan 25 1 comments Kanaky : qui jette le Caillou dans la mare ? 23:44 Nov 22 0 comments Indigenous struggles against capitalism in Australia 19:46 Aug 31 0 comments [Mozambique] A more complex reality in Cabo Delgado 21:13 Mar 31 32 comments more >> |
Recent articles by Anarkismo Editorial Group
Anarkismo.net augura a tutti un 2016 di solidarietà e resistenza 0 comments Anarkismo εύχεται ένα... 0 comments Συνέντευξη μ ... 0 comments Recent Articles about North America / Mexico Indigenous struggles¡Arantepakua no está sola! Jun 28 17 “Llegó la hora, ¡acabaremos con el mal gobierno!”: Concejo Indígena de... Jun 03 17 A change in direction for the EZLN
north america / mexico |
indigenous struggles |
feature
Tuesday June 21, 2005 21:27 by Anarkismo Editorial Group - Anarkismo
Follows the process from the Red Alert to details of the new campaign
The EZLN declared a Red Alert in Chiapas in June taking a number of steps including closing down the Caracoles and the Good Government offices, evacuating the civilian delegates who make up the zapatista structures of regional self management and creating a clear distinction between the military side of the organisation and the civilian healthcare side. This looked a lot like preparation for war but a communique released the following day revealed that the red alert was just a precautionary measure to allow a consulta to take place. The 6th Declaration of the Selva Lacandona was then released - it outlines the new strategy and the communiques which follow it add more detail. Anarkismo.net brought you news and analysis of this situation as it developed. Here we carry the Zapatista communiques and background materials and links that help explain who the Zapatistas are, what they stand for and what are the causes of the conflict in Chiapas. Complete EZLN communique - 6th Declaration of the Selva Lacandona (English)EZLN reveal new strategy The EZLN announced the end of its consulta which had trigged the red alert (see feature) and that a ' Sixth Declaration of the Selva Lacandona' was on its way. These declarations in the past have been key strategy announcements. This is the declaration which ends with a call for a new international encounter and an alliance with the non-electoral left in Mexico who want to build from below. Sesta dichiarazione della Selva Lacandona (Italiano) Sexta Declaración del la Selva Lacandona (Castellano) More detailsThis set of communiques includes the re-opening of the Caracoles and details of the "Sixth Committee" which is to meet with people or organizations who do not participate in elections to form 'the other campaign'. Meetings will then be held in Chiapas of various sectors with the aim of issuing a common statement agreed by all on September 16. The communiques in this batch are Marcos on responses to the 6th declarationA Penguin in the Selva Lacandona Macos of the EZLN responds to some of the responses they have received to the text of the 6th declaration. He goes on to ask what impact all the international and national solidarity has had on the children who have grown up during the Zapatista rebellion Zapatista Consultas are long processes that involve every community in discussions that frame questions that all will then vote on. The first article below written before the red alert perhaps gives some clues as to why this process is taking place. The articles 'What is it that is different about the Zapatistas?' includes an outline of the consulta process in more detail. Zapatista's - 11 years on, a retreat and a consolidation EZLN communique -
The
reasons for the Red Alert EZLN -
A letter of explanation...and/or, perhaps, farewell EZLN communique -Zapatista
Red Alert declared in Chiapas EZLN communique -
Zapatistas
can survive a decapatation attack What
is it that is different about the Zapatistas? What
is happening with the Zapatistas? Indigenous
Autonomy and Revolutionary Resistance
El Anarquismo Revolucionario y la Sexta Declaracion |
Front pageUpdate on the Campaign for the Sudanese Anarchists Malatesta’s Revolutionary Anarchism in British Exile Encuentros Ácratas: Miradas anarquistas sobre el libertarianismo de derecha. An Anarchist View of Trotsky’s "Transitional Program" A volunteer from Kharkov was tortured by the military after trying to leave Ukraine FORO CONVERSATORIO: A 50 AÑOS DEL GOLPE CÍVICO MILITAR Los desafíos y tareas del anarquismo Anarchists in Rojava: Revolution is a struggle in itself An Attempted Marxist-Anarchist Dialogue Taller de Estudios Anarquistas: La experiencia de los paros nacionales en Colombia Comunicado Público a 50 años del Golpe Cívico-Militar A Talk on the Ukrainian-Russian War Sürgündeki Sudanlı anarşistleri destekleyin Υποστηρίξτε τους Σουδανούς αναρχικούς |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (12 of 12)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Originally posted here Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:46:05, date changed is that it appears as the first comment
Originally published in Spanish by the CCRI-CG of the EZLN
************************************
Translated by irlandesa
Communiqué from the Clandestine Revolutionary Indigenous Committee -
General Command of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation.
Mexico.
June 26, 2005.
To the People of Mexico:
To the Peoples of the World:
First - The CCRI-CG of the EZLN is informing you that it has finished
consulting with tens of thousands of support bases. Between June 20 and
June 26, meetings and assemblies were held in more than one thousand
indigenous communities in the southeastern Mexican state of Chiapas.
Second - Participating in these assemblies were only 100% indigenous and
100% Mexican men and women, adults, EZLN support bases, who listened to
reports from the zapatista leadership. There was also an analysis of the
national situation and of the proposal for a new step in the struggle.
Third - After analyzing and discussing the advantages and disadvantages,
the dangers and the risks, everyone expressed themselves, through
individual, free votes, concerning the proposal.
Fourth - The results were that more than 98% approved the new step, and
less than 2% decided not to support the proposal.
Fifth - In this manner, with the approval and backing of the wide
majority of its members, the EZLN shall undertake a new political
initiative that is national and international in nature.
Sixth - In order to report on what was analyzed and discussed in the
internal consulta - in addition to explaining and calling for joining in
with the new initiative which has been approved - the CCRI-CG of the EZLN
will, over the next few days, make public a series of texts which are part
of the "Sixth Declaration of the Selva Lacandona."
Democracy!
Liberty!
Justice!
From the Mountains of the Mexican Southeast.
By the Clandestine Revolutionary Indigenous Committee - General Command of
the Zapatista Army of National Liberation.
Subcomandante Insurgente Marcos
Mexico, in the sixth month of 2005.
whats the background on this? why are the zapatistas going up in arms? is it offensive or is it defensive?
is it public information whether or not they've kept themselves armed, and to what degree?
I've talked to someone down there but there is not much to report beyond that this has taken everybody by surprise. One thing to note though is that the harvest isn't due for a couple of months which would make this a very odd time for the Zapatistas to initate anything.
It's worth remembering that in the past Marcos has claimed to have got links from within the Fox cabinet (I quote it in my article).
The best speculation about what might be happening I have seen to date was contained in an article by Rafael which I quote below
may of 2005 the Zapatistas released a communiquee in which they announced to send a delegation to Europe. Their spokesman, “Subcomandante Marcos” ended with a post scriptum:
"P.S. in the tone and volume of a sports announcer – The Sup, using the tactics of the Uruguayan Obdulio Varela in the final against Brazil (World Cup, Maracaná Stadium, Rio de Janeiro, 7/16/1950), ball in hand, having traveled as if in slow motion (since May of 2001), from the zapatista goalpost. After complaining to the referee about the illegitimacy of the goal, he puts the ball in the center of the field. He turns around to look at his compañeros and they exchange glances and silences. With the scorecard, the bets and the entire system against them, NO ONE has any hope for the zapatistas. It starts to rain. A watch reads almost 6. Everything appears ready for the game to resume…"
And the game resumed last Sunday. Today on Tuesday, when I’m writing this article, it is still unclear what prompted the red alert. There are a few possible explanations:
A peaceful solution to the conflict seemed impossible to the Zapatistas. The Zapatista support bases have decided to restart the shooting war to achieve their objectives. This explanation seems highly unlikely to me. The past ten years the Zapatistas moved away from armed struggle to achieve their goals. Furthermore, they lack the military capabilty to confront the Mexican federal army in a full-out war.
The Zapatistas have been alarmed by troop movements of the federal army. They foresee a possible attack and prepare to defend themselves. According to spokespersons of the Mexican government there have been no troop movements that can be explained as such. Moreover, the Zapatista spokesperson wrote ended the communiquee of last Sunday with: “Vale. Health, and pay attention, because down below the watch reads six”. This might mean that back in may the Zapatistas already knew they were preparing for this red alert”.
The Zapatistas fear an attack by a paramilitary organisation. The pas eleven and a half years, hundreds of civil Zapatistas and members of the civil society have been assassinated by forces that were trained, armed and directed by the federal army and the political parties. Although the murderers and the intellectual authors of these murders were rarely prosecuted and convicted, the Zapatisata have never retaliated these crimes. They denounced the murders by the official government and waited for justice.
A fourth possible reason is to my opinion the most probable. About six months ago a communiquee was released in which the Mexican justice department was urged to arrest and trial the murderers of unarmed civilians in Chiapas and end the impunity that had reigned Chiapas for eleven years. They warned the government that if justice would not be achieved, the zapatistas, after turning the other cheek for 11 years, would arrest and trial these murderers themselves. It is very likely that they are about to do just that. And they expect retaliation by the paramilitaries and the army who are intimately connected.
As to arms - well the Zapatistas never disarmed but they were never that well armed in the first place. The Mexican army on the other hand is armed with recent vintage US army stuff.
The latest communique
EZLN communique - Zapatistas can survive a decapatation attack
Would hint that they expect some sort of government/paramilitary attack.Communique from EZLN saying that they have put the structures in place which would allow the organisation to survice even if the government or its paramilitaries eliminate "some or all of its publicly known current leadership."
It turns out the red alert is just a precautionary measure so that a consulta can be carried out. I'm updating the feature to reflect this and pasting in the text of the old feature here to preserve a record of the original sense of panic
Text of old feature followes
On you can see from the newswire the EZLN has declared a Red Alert in Chiapas and taken a number of steps including closing down the Caracoles and the Good Government offices, evacuating the civilian delegates who make up the zapatista structures of regional self management and creating a clear distinction between the military side of the organisation and the civilian healthcare side. This looks a lot like preparation for war.
Everyone seems to have been taken by surprise by this announcement although the communique was rapidly translated and circulated on the internet. The only apparent immediate possible cause were army raids in the Los Altos area in which allegedly the army "destroyed a total of 9 acres of marijuana plants". However even here it should be noted that Zapatista law forbids the growing of marijuana and the Good Government Councils are tasked with the job of ensuring any found growing is destroyed.
Anarkismo.net will be bringing you news and analysis of the situation as it develops - we start off here by carrying the Zapatista communique and background materials and links that help explain who the Zapatistas are, what they stand for and what are the causes of the conflict in Chiapas.
This feature will be updated with links to new material as it arrives
text of feature continues
The LA times is reporting Ernesto Ledesma Arronte of the CAPISE Indian rights center as saying "Something like this could only be caused by an important military mobilization. I think it has to do with the army," but the Mexican's government peace commissioner for Chiapas, Luis H. Alvarez is saying "it can be affirmed categorically that the border zone of Los Altos and the Chiapas jungle are in a state of full normality"
According to Reuters "The Defense Ministry in Mexico City said in a statement that almost 200 troops from infantry and armored units joined federal police in destroying marijuana plantations in three rebel-held zones." but the Chiapas state government said federal troops had recently pulled out of the area. "Some military bases have been withdrawn. Only two days ago one pulled out so we don't know what is happening,"
We are not.
I don't think anyone called them anarchists on this site - however we all think that they are fighting for a libertarian communist world - "Everything for everyone", "Lead by obeying", "A world where many worlds are possible" etc., all symbolize a desire for a free society in which property and the market system have been abolished.
The Zaps seem to have spent considerable time putting the Mexican (and American) government at east. They have repeatedly said they will not attempt to fight the central state. Their actions have backed this up. If they initiated fighting, it would be from a defensive position of weakness. In insurgencies, that's rarely a good plan.
For a few years, it's looked like the EZ is a "finite" movement. I hope they pick it up, a lot of us do. But I"m not counting on it. When the Acteal massacre happened, their response was to take it. The army and paramilitaries established that the EZ couldn't even defend their supporting communities and since then all the autonomous municipalities are effectively surrounded by Mexican federal troops.
It's hard to see the EZ changing their political orientation, even after they've failed to achieve their objectives.
It is now clear (see letter from Marcos) that offensive military action is not one of the options being considered in the Consulta. As someone who has been in Zapatista communities, even if only briefly, I for one am relieved. Having seen the weapons they have on public display and the might of the Mexican army a return to war outside of some sort of mass upsurge throughout Mexico would be suicide.
The Zapatista communities were surrounded by the army long before the Acteal massacre and indeed that massacre was of refugees on the edge of the zapatista area rather than of a zapatisa base. More than that 'The bees' as they are called are a religious pacifist movement who share some common aims with the zapatistas but are seperate from them. The paramilitaries couldn't have picked a 'softer' target than a community of pacifist refugees.
Those who want the zapatistas to glorously die for them need to think things out a little further. There is no prospect of military success - the best that could be hoped for would be ambushes on an army that was busy over running the very communities that comprise the movement. The Zapatista militia can do that but what of the civilian base, the old and the children in particular. Your military adventure would make them refugees at best - the worst is the spectre of the counter insurgency across the border in the 1980's that left 100,000 dead - mainly civilians.
The answer is not a military one but a political one and unfortuantely it is not a political answer to be found in Chiapas alone. Any large step forward has to be a step taken outside of Chiapas which is a poor and isolated backwater in Mexico. The zapatistas have put huge resources into encouraging others elsewhere and although more than a few have sought them out it is still a tiny number in a country of 95 million.
Of course the political question is much bigger again than Mexico. If Reagan was unwilling to tolerate the Sandanistas in Nicargua how do you expect that Bush would tolerate a zapatista revolution in Mexico - on the very borders of the USA. The step forward that is required does not stop at the Rio Grande but also has to head north across it - at the very least at the level of a solidarity movement that could stop US military intervention. As the Iraq war shows that is not an easy task.
So rather than suggesting the zapatistas should launch a futile military campaign maybe you should prepare for the day when they might be successful and it will be up to you to have prepared such a movement in the USA. With that as your task I think rather than seeking rapid action you should hope for as much time as you can get!
good summation - although i don't know if a solidarity movement alone can stop a war - if there was a revolution in mexico that looked like it would win, the only thing that could hold back the US is if they needed all of their army here. A solidarity movement can play support for someone else, maybe dampen the US army's ability to fight and increase the Zap (or whomevers) ability to fight, but only widespread insurrection here would pull back the US army.
After all, the US army was in france, germany, russia, and mexico at the same time as the IWW was raising hell here in the 1910's, and the US army was much more second rate at that time.
However, the US army is currently built very heavily on latin american immigrants, and its very questionable what would happen to the morale if they were told to invade mexico - its more likely that there would be incredibly high arming of contras before they resorted to actual invasion.
It seems from the marcos letter circulating about that the EZLN (and probably Marcos himself) are thinking about moving on to other projects and letting the indigenous communities and others continue on with their civil work. It'll be interesting to see what the decisions of the Consulta will be, and what exactly, these "other interests" that Marcos cites will be (will they move to another country? will they engage on some sort of world wide resistance movement?).