user preferences

The Illogic of Capitalism

category north america / mexico | economy | opinion / analysis author Saturday December 30, 2006 01:54author by Jae Muzzin - Windsor Guerilla Gardening Collectiveauthor email roadwindsor at riseup dot net Report this post to the editors

Under capitalism, the condition for economic activity is the business owner's ability to reap profit. Under logic, the condition for economic activity is to alleviate material scarcity. Under capitalism, food is produced to sell for profit. Under logic, food is produced to feed people. Under capitalism, the Earth is a resource. Under logic, the Earth is our habitat.

The Illogic of Capitalism:

1)There can be a shortage of consumable goods, yet massive unemployment.
Labour produces goods, so it's logical that when there is a shortage of goods, more labour is needed to end the shortage. This is a very simple concept, and anywhere there is poverty, there are people looking for work who see employment as a way to eradicate this poverty. A community without adequate housing would logically seek to build more houses, and a people without food would logically seek to grow more food. As humans, we are able to find solutions to problems, and we are willing to labour at these solutions until the problem is solved.

In spite of the logic described above, poverty and unemployment go hand-in-hand in capitalist societies. Through private property laws, capitalists literally own the means of production. They own and control the land, the tools, and the assets required to produce goods and alleviate poverty. When the preconditions of production are such that the capitalist will profit from this economic activity, the capitalist will use these assets to produce goods, and through the wage he gives to his employees, they are able to purchase goods which keeps them from falling into material scarcity. However, when the preconditions of production do not allow profit to be made, either because of market forces or otherwise, the capitalist halts production and closes the factory, farm or shop. Although unused, the capitalist class (banks, mortgage companies, holding firms), retains ownership of these assets incase they can be used at a later time or sold off. With the business closed, and the employees out of work, they no longer have a wage to purchase the necessities of life. So the workers are now in a position of material scarcity. Logic would tell them to labour and produce the things they need, but this solution is not viable because the means of production are owned by the capitalist class, and this ownership is enforced by the state, which has a monopoly on violence thus preventing people from forcibly taking back the means to produce.

Under capitalism, the condition for economic activity is the business owner's ability to reap profit. Under logic, the condition for economic activity is to alleviate material scarcity.

2)There can be enough food for everybody, yet people go hungry
Food alleviates hunger, so its logical that when there is hunger, food will be produced to end that hunger. All species have the ability to feed themselves, and the procurement of food is a prerequisite of any living being. Modern humans have the ability to control their food production, and almost every geographical region on Earth has the ability to sustain human life. Given these facts, there is no reason why any person should go hungry. But as we shall see, capitalism finds ways to ignore the most obvious of logic.

In "developed" and "underdeveloped" countries alike, people go hungry who are not able to acquire the food they need to maintain a healthy diet. Despite the vast amounts of food being produced, people still cannot find enough to eat. Once again, the illogical capitalist pursuit of profit is to blame. By using food as a way to reap profit, the emphasis is put no longer on feeding people, but on securing a fruitful economy for the owning class. By alienating people from the growing and processing of food, the capitalist economy forces us to procure food through monetary exchange. Inherent in capitalist economy is the monopolistic accumulation of money by the owning class, thus the vast majority of people are left with little or no money and entrapped in debt and servitude. Since we trade money for food, and the distribution of money is grossly unequal, it follows that the distribution of food is grossly unequal. This is proved empirically by observing that the poorest of people are also the ones who have the least food available.

Since we proved that the unequal distribution of food is due to the unequal distribution of money, we may hypothesize that an unmediated, direct method of producing food would alleviate hunger (ie people/communities growing their own food). This hypothesis is true, but only if we do not consider the capitalist monopolization of land and assets. For people to grow their own food, they must first procure land, but this would bring them into conflict with the capitalist owner of that land, who has the violent force of the state on his side.

Under capitalism, food is produced to sell for profit. Under logic, food is produced to feed people.

3)There can be impending ecological disaster, yet a continued drive towards development
Science shows us that modern humans are having a detrimental effect on the environment. Logic tells us that we must adjust our living habits in order to preserve the world's ecosystems. This has become engrained in people's consciousness, and individuals have taken on initiatives like reusing goods, cutting down on their waste, carpooling, etc. As humans we have the capacity to determine how we are harming the Earth, and we have the empathy to stop these harmful practices. However, the institutions, social organization, and production methods imposed on us by capitalism have made true ecological reform impossible as long as capitalism continues to exist.

The goal of the capitalist is to reap profit and accumulate more wealth. The method of reaching this goal is through economy. The process of producing and selling a commodity is how capitalists make their profit. The labour of workers is sold on the market (by selling the goods produced by these workers), and the capitalist gives only a fraction of this money back to the worker (this is the wage system). The surplus from this sale is what gives the capitalist wealth. From this, we can ascertain that without this process of producing and selling, the capitalist would have no way of procuring wealth. Thus production is necessary for the existence of capitalism, and the more commodities that are produced, the more surplus wealth is generated for the owning class. With more wealth, the capitalist is able to buy more assets, which in turn makes him more wealth, and this perpetuates until he is able to beat other businesses in a price war or outright buy them out. This is the 'grow or die' principle often cited in capitalist economic discourse. We know that matter and energy cannot be created from nothing, so this growth of production is only possible if we take matter and energy from something else. The only possibilities is to take matter and energy from existing production facilities, or natural resources. The clearcutting of forests, the depletion of fish stocks, the scarcity of fossil fuels, these are all examples of capitalist production growing at the cost of the natural world.

Other kinds of ecological destruction(CO2 emissions, species extinction) are byproducts of the economy that capitalists created. Since profit is the goal of the capitalist, and economy is the source of this profit, it follows that the existence of the economy takes precedence over the existence of a healthy environment. It is not possible for a capitalism to balance both concerns, because this violates the 'grow or die' principle, which is inherent to capitalism.

Under capitalism, the Earth is a resource. Under logic, the Earth is our habitat.

author by tiltpublication date Sat Jan 13, 2007 17:24author address author phone Report this post to the editors


here is some aspect that in my humble opinion does not fit into the "capitalism vs. communism" antagonism that you, although noteworthily exact provide an application of .

As you know, I live in Germany. The nation's jurisdiction (what makes the law) has integrated environment protection into the law.

By "having ecology in the law", it could be assumed that environment protection (at least partially) is understood as a "task of the society", not a "(deliberate) decision of individuals".

On the other hand, please read this account:

1) In my country, to reduce CO2-emissions there are regulations on how a residential heating system must be built and what emission measure values it must comply to.

2) Consequently, the organisation of who were formerly know as "chimney-sweepers" has been reformed to certificate heating systems and to perform "emission measurements" going from house to house.

3) But what do - at least - some of them really do?

Some of them are closely associated with the local vendors of oil central heatings, and if a heating system does not pass the emission test, they will strongly suggest installation of one of those people's products. More specifically, our local certifier and our local oil heating vendor know each other personally and coordinate their requests and offers as well as their time schedule.

4) This phenomenon is a specialization of what is in more general terms known as "corruption".

From my point of view, there is a "more general form of greed" than that symptomizing in captial-based, libertarian and speculating economy systems. "Corruption", the abuse of voids, of grey and of unmonitored areas in a society undermining relevant functions of the society, subverting the agenda of its organisation, appears in "captialism", in "socialism", in other systems as well.

Friendly Greetings.

author by Mason Roepublication date Fri Jul 02, 2010 02:45author address author phone Report this post to the editors

If producing food is to make a profit, it only stands to reason that because they are providing a service they will require funds to pay the workers, the equipment, the seeds to plant the food, the irrigation to grow the food, the taxes on the land. If in Canada the health care they provide for their employees, the CPP contributions they pay to the government for their employees. I can go on and on but I will stop there. If you live in Canada, or any other county for that matter you are part of capitalism. If by chance you live on an island with no outside support and are completly self sufficient then I apologize you are surviving outside of Capitalism. But based on the fact that you typed your rant on a computer, posted it on the internet, on a webpage with ads and links to sites like twitter and facebook. I can only assume you enjoy what capitalism has provided you with but still want to bite the hand that feeds you.

This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch

Front page

Declaración Anarquista Internacional: A 85 Años De La Revolución Española. Sus Enseñanzas Y Su Legado.

Death or Renewal: Is the Climate Crisis the Final Crisis?

Gleichheit und Freiheit stehen nicht zur Debatte!

Contre la guerre au Kurdistan irakien, contre la traîtrise du PDK

Meurtre de Clément Méric : l’enjeu politique du procès en appel

Comunicado sobre el Paro Nacional y las Jornadas de Protesta en Colombia

The Broken Promises of Vietnam

Premier Mai : Un coup porté contre l’un·e d’entre nous est un coup porté contre nous tou·tes

Federasyon’a Çağırıyoruz!

Piştgirîye Daxuyanîya Çapemenî ji bo Êrîşek Hatîye li ser Xanîyê Mezopotamya

Les attaques fascistes ne nous arrêteront pas !

Les victoires de l'avenir naîtront des luttes du passé. Vive la Commune de Paris !

Contra la opresión patriarcal y la explotación capitalista: ¡Ninguna está sola!

100 Years Since the Kronstadt Uprising: To Remember Means to Fight!

El Rei està nu. La deriva autoritària de l’estat espanyol

Agroecology and Organized Anarchism: An Interview With the Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro (FARJ)

Es Ley por la Lucha de Las de Abajo

Covid19 Değil Akp19 Yasakları: 14 Maddede Akp19 Krizi

Declaración conjunta internacionalista por la libertad de las y los presos politicos de la revuelta social de la región chilena

[Perú] Crónica de una vacancia anunciada o disputa interburguesa en Perú

Nigeria and the Hope of the #EndSARS Protests

How Do We Stop a Coup?

Aλληλεγγύη στους 51 αντιφασίστες της Θεσσαλονίκης

No war on China

© 2005-2021 Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]