user preferences

Power and Anarchism: Approximation or Contradiction?

category international | anarchist movement | opinion / analysis author Monday January 17, 2022 21:16author by Felipe Corrêa - OASL Report this post to the editors

First of all, I would like to acknowledge the invitation from the comrades at Ekintza Zuzena magazine, who, after reading the book Anarchism and Popular Power: South American Theory and Practice, were interested in the present topic and decided to put it up for debate. For me and for the anarchist current to which I belong, especifista anarchism, the debate on power in general and popular power in particular is of the utmost importance, not only for a rereading of anarchist classics, but also for political practice of a revolutionary character. Therefore, we must salute and celebrate the decision.

In Latin America there is some controversy around these issues, but in different countries and for many groups and organizations—this is the case, for example, for the nine Brazilian organizations that make up the Brazilian Anarchist Coordination [Coordenação Anarquista Brasileira] (CAB) and the Uruguayan Anarchist Federation (FAU)—there has been broad agreement for some years now. It is important that this debate continues to take place in Europe, and that in some way links up with others that are taking place, such as the one that the Federation of Anarchist Communists (FdCA) is conducting based on the contributions of the Brazilian CAB.

ffb58e848e7049738b31e67514788c97_90_90.jpg

POWER AND ANARCHISM:
APPROXIMATION OR CONTRADICTION?

THE LATIN AMERICAN DEBATE AND EUROPE

First of all, I would like to acknowledge the invitation from the comrades at Ekintza Zuzena magazine, who, after reading the book Anarchism and Popular Power: South American Theory and Practice,[1] were interested in the present topic and decided to put it up for debate. For me and for the anarchist current to which I belong, especifista anarchism, the debate on power in general and popular power in particular is of the utmost importance, not only for a rereading of anarchist classics, but also for political practice of a revolutionary character. Therefore, we must salute and celebrate the decision.

In Latin America there is some controversy around these issues, but in different countries and for many groups and organizations—this is the case, for example, for the nine Brazilian organizations that make up the Brazilian Anarchist Coordination [Coordenação Anarquista Brasileira] (CAB) and the Uruguayan Anarchist Federation (FAU)—there has been broad agreement for some years now. It is important that this debate continues to take place in Europe, and that in some way links up with others that are taking place, such as the one that the Federation of Anarchist Communists (FdCA) is conducting based on the contributions of the Brazilian CAB.

THE TERMS OF DEBATE

Unfortunately, the terms of debate on power and popular power, as presented in Anarchism and Popular Power, are quite troublesome, especially for those who oppose the relationship that has been established between anarchism and power and between anarchism and popular power. It can be seen especially in the contributions of Patrick Rossineri and Rafael Uzcátegui.[2] There are at least three fundamental problems that complicate the debate and that we point out below.

First, the authors are correct in arguing that this debate should not be carried out on the basis of testing to see who is the most anarchist, nor should others be accused without argument of not being an anarchist. But when the authors argue that the defense of popular power implies “a form of integration into the system”[3] or claim that “the term PP [popular power] is an update on what the authoritarians defined, before the fall of the Wall, as a ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’”[4], they are saying, between the lines, that if there are anarchists who defend the concept of popular power, they would be integrated into the system and/or defend the dictatorship of the proletariat, which, since it constitutes one of the main flags of classical Marxism, would put them closer to Marxism and distance them from anarchism. This disqualification of the adversary position, in addition to lacking a consistent argumentation, does not properly and seriously establish the debate.

Second, a discussion of this type must take into account the distinction between form and content: a historical phenomenon and/or a strategic position must be distinguished from the terminology used to refer to them. This distinction is necessary because the debate on power among anarchists, as it is taking place, is much more a question of terminology — that is, of the validity or relevance of using that concept — than a debate about anarchist thought and action. After all, the term power, like many others — democracy, freedom, socialism, and even anarchism — varies in meaning from time to time. Consciously or not, at every moment we tend to use and challenge more or less the meaning of terms and concepts.

Using the argument of the authors cited, it could be said that James Guillaume, one of the most important names in first-generation anarchism, should not be considered an anarchist, since he always opposed the use of this term and never claimed it as such. It seems that terminological criteria cannot be the only one to define whether or not someone is an anarchist. In this sense, anarchism does not have to be studied through concepts used historically by anarchists. With due rigor and without much difficulty, perhaps we can make use of other concepts — say 'collective identity' or 'symbolic capital', for example — even if they have never been used by anarchists.

Beyond this, we note that a considerable part of the methodological resources of Rossineri and Uzcátegui do not have argumentative force. Following them we could claim, for example, that defending freedom means being liberal. They define freedom based on a classic liberal and associate their adversary with liberalism. The same could be done with the term “socialism” or with the proximity with Marxism.

All concepts used have a meaning, it is not possible to stick with form without regard to content. In the case in question, if power is conceived in terms of domination and/or State, obviously it can be said that anarchists were and are historically against power. The same applies to the concepts of freedom and socialism: if the former were defended in the liberal sense and the second in the Marxist sense, it could also be said that anarchists are against them. But the anarchists who defend the anarchism-power link give this term a different meaning. What is in question, then, is the necessity or relevance of using the notion of power.

It is a perfectly reasonable argument that in a given context, for various reasons, it is preferable that anarchists do not use the terms power and popular power. This was the case, for some time, for the Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro [Federação Anarquista do Rio de Janeiro] (FARJ).[5] However, it is absurd to want to link the anarchist defense of power or popular power with Marxism or other currents more or less on the left, simply because of the preference in the use of that concept.

Third, it is necessary to distinguish future objectives and strategies that anarchists advocate from the historical reading they have done in the past or do in the present. The history of anarchism is very broad. To theoretically discuss anarchism, in addition to going beyond the Eurocentric focus and adopting a global and broad vision like that of the South African Lucien van der Walt, it is necessary to establish a series of concepts, since in its hundred and fifty years there has been no homogenous conceptualization on the part of anarchists.[6]

Most of the classic anarchists gave to the concept of power a restricted content of State or domination, for that reason they declared themselves in opposition. Bakunin says that “whoever speaks of political power speaks of domination”[7], and Kropotkin says that “to the extent that the socialists constitute a power in bourgeois society and in the present state, their socialism will die”[8]. Malatesta, for his part, criticizes authoritarian socialists stating that they “propose the conquest of power” to emancipate the people, says that this means using the “same mechanism that today has enslaved them” and proposes, as a libertarian way out, the “Abolition of the Government and of all power”[9]. Even so, defined in another way—which is the most adequate way to establish a dialogue with other authors and militants, to base the role of anarchists in social struggles and to formulate proper intervention strategies—classical anarchists can be considered defenders of a certain type of power, which has come to be called “popular power” or “self-managed power”[10]. Historically power has not been defined in this way by anarchists. Although there have been examples of this use of the concept since at least the 1920s, as in the case of Korean anarchism,[11] it seems that it was not until after the 1960s that it became more widely disseminated among anarchists.

Distinct from historical reading, however, is the formulation of anarchist strategies based on certain objectives. When anarchists point in this direction, they may consider it more or less relevant to use a certain term, depending on the context in question. For example, in a context where the generalized conception of “democracy” is that of representative democracy, anarchists may decide not to use this term. And the same happens with other terms. This was, exactly, Guillaume's argument for not calling himself an anarchist: according to his point of view, in that context the generalized conception of the term was misleading.

ANARCHISM AND POWER

The problem around form and content indicated above is not limited to anarchist studies. Tomás Ibáñez points it out in a rigorous study of power:
The fact that researchers of power relations continue, after so many years, dedicating an important part of their efforts to clarify and refine the content of the notion of power, the fact that there is no widespread minimal agreement on its meaning and that the controversies are more about differences in concept than about operations and results achieved from those conceptualizations, all of this clearly indicates that theorizing about power encounters, somewhere, an epistemological obstacle that prevents progress.[12]
The lack of shared meaning in relation to the term and the epistemological obstacle to which Ibáñez also refers are noted by Rossineri and Uzcátegui. And it is also found in anarchist writings, thus complicating the establishment of a precise discussion on power in anarchism.

As we have said, in the anarchist classics the term power is mostly associated with the state or domination. On the other hand, they often treat the terms domination and authority as synonyms. What we ask ourselves is: should power be conceptualized only as domination or State? Are power, domination and authority synonyms? In my opinion, in both cases the answer is negative.

The hegemonic position within anarchism at least until the 1970s, which still survives today in positions such as those of Rossineri and Uzcátegui, is the one that maintains that anarchists are against all power, understanding it as synonymous with domination or State. Positions of this type have been and still are relatively common: “All anarchist theory is founded on the critique of power and the effects it produces.” Furthermore, “anarchists never proposed popular power, nor power for a class. […] When there is symmetry and reciprocity in a social relationship, it is because the power relationship ceased to exist”[13]. However, positions like these were responsible, in some historical moments, for anarchists distancing themselves from politics, from the real intervention in the interplay of forces in society, ultimately condemning them to the role of critical observers of reality, without the possibility of intervening in it; in other cases, this translated into misguided strategic decisions, with disastrous consequences.

Deepening the analysis and extrapolating aspects of form, it can be affirmed, as Ibáñez points out and has increasingly become more emphatic and clear in the last forty years, it does not seem acceptable “to consider that the relationship of libertarian thought with the concept of power can only be formulated in terms of denial, exclusion, rejection, opposition or even antinomy”[14]. Ibáñez believes that the innumerable definitions of power can be grouped into three main approaches: 1) power as capacity; 2) power as asymmetry in power relations, and 3) power as structures and mechanisms of regulation and control. Taking this into account, it can be stated: “There is a libertarian conception of power, it is false that it consists of a denial of power”[15].

Historical examples abound for demonstrating that anarchists never opposed the notion that people, groups and social classes have the capacity to realize something; that society is made up of a diversity of forces at play and that, in their quest for social transformation, anarchists must stimulate the growth of a determined force to overcome the enemy, hegemonic forces in the social field; and that, at the same time that they oppose the structures and mechanisms of authoritarian regulation and control, anarchists propose others, with a libertarian base, which constitute the foundations of the future society that they propose.

Bakunin affirms that “the negligible human being represents a minuscule fraction of the social force”[16] Kropotkin emphasises that “force—and a great deal of force—is necessary to prevent workers from taking possession of what they consider unjustly appropriated by the few”[17]. Malatesta, for his part, recommends:

We must work to awaken in the oppressed the living desire for a radical social transformation and convince them that, by uniting, they will have the necessary strength to win. We must extend our ideal and prepare the moral and material forces necessary to defeat the enemy forces and organize the new society.[18]
Defeating enemy forces means, for Malatesta, making the revolution, socializing the economy and politics by creating “new institutions, new groupings and new social relations”. It is about initiating a social reconstruction that can “provide satisfaction of immediate needs and prepare the future”, destroying “privileges and harmful institutions and make [...] work, for the benefit of all, the useful institutions that today work exclusively or mainly for the benefit of the ruling classes”[19].

Therefore, based on Ibáñez's triple definition, it is not possible to claim that anarchists are against power.

POWER: BETWEEN DOMINATION AND SELF-MANAGEMENT

When anarchists claimed to be against power, they actually used the “word ‘power’ to refer [...] to a ‘certain type of power relations’”, namely, and very specifically, the type of power that we find in the “relations of domination”, in “structures of domination”, in “devices of domination”, or in the “apparatuses of domination”[20]. The anarchist critique of exploitation, of coercion, of alienation, always had as a backdrop a critique of domination in general, including class domination and gender domination, domination based on race and between countries or peoples (imperialism).

By advocating federalism, anarchists proposed, according to René Berthier, social relations based on broad participation in decision-making processes, through a system in which there was “neither absorption of all power from above (centralism), nor atomization of power (autonomism)”[21]. As Frank Mintz points out, the term “self-management” did not emerge until the 1960s to also refer to an organizational model based on broad popular participation.[22] Although there have been subsequent attempts to restrict federalism to the political realm and self-management to the economic field, the truth is that they are terms that encompass fairly close concepts and have been used interchangeably by anarchists. The anarchist defense of the socialization of private property and political power and of a culture that reinforces this project, articulated from the bottom up, is based on generalized self-management, taking into account all its social aspects and including the notion of federalism.

Domination and self-management are directly related with the concept of power that we are going to define according to the second approach of Ibáñez. Defining power in this way allows us to conceptualize it as a relationship that is established in the struggles and conflicts between a diversity of social forces, when one(s) force(s) is imposed on the other(s). In this sense, power and power relations function as synonyms.[23] The link between domination, self-management and power runs through the notion of participation: considered established by relationships of power, participation may be greater and approach the field of self-management, or less and bring it closer to that of domination. Looking at them from the perspective of participation, then, domination and self-management would be ideal types of power relations: however more dominating the power, the less the participation; and vice versa, the more self-managed, the greater the participation:

The extremes constituted by domination and self-management theoretically mark the logical possibilities of the limits in the processes of participation. Regardless of the real possibility or not of arriving at one of the extreme ideal types, what is relevant is to conceive of them as a logical theoretical model for understanding the different power relations, the types of these relationships and the different forms of participation that derive from them. […] Conceiving of power relations within these two extremes, from the axis of participation, constitutes a method of analysis of relations in different spheres.[24]
According to this model, the objective of anarchists was always to support social relations with greater participation and that substituted dominating power—“domination, hierarchy, alienation, monopoly of decisions by a minority, class structure and exploitation”—with self-managing power—“self-management, broad participation in decisions, non-alienated agents, non-hierarchical relations, without relations of domination, without class structure and exploitation”[25].

This way of understanding power is contrary to its conception as a synonym for domination or the State. As we have said, domination is a type of power, as is self-management. Power relations can be established with greater or lesser participation, so that power does not necessarily imply domination. The State is a central element of the system of domination, and in all its historical forms it means relations of domination, fundamentally those of a political-bureaucratic type and coercion. Structures of self-managed political power advocated by anarchists to replace the state, for their part, also represent power, but not domination.

Original article: “Anarquismo y Poder: aproximación o contradicción?”. Firstly published at Ekintza Zuzena magazine, num. 41 (Bilbao, Espanha, 2014).

* Translated by Enrique Guerrero-López


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bakunin, Mikhail. “A Ilusão do Sufrágio Universal”. Woodcock, George (ed.). Os Grandes Escritos Anarquistas. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 1998. [Illusion of Universal Suffrage]
_____. A Ciência e a Questão Vital da Revolução. São Paulo: Imaginário / Faísca, 2009.
Berthier, René. Do Federalismo. São Paulo: Imaginário, 2011.
Corrêa, Felipe. “Poder, Dominação e Autogestão”. Anarkismo.net, 2011.
_____. Rediscutindo o Anarquismo: uma abordagem teórica. São Paulo: USP (master’s thesis), 2012.
_____. “Create a Strong People: Contributions to the Debate on Popular Power”. Institute for Anarchist Theory and History, 2022.
Crisi, Emilio et alli. “Revolución Anarquista en Corea: la Comuna de Shinmin (1929-1932) y otros textos sobre el anarquismo coreano”. Institute for Anarchist Theory and History, 2013.
Ediciones Gato Negro (eds.). Anarquismo y Poder Popular: teoría y práctica suramericana. Bogotá / Manresa: Gato Negro / Rojinegro, 2011.
Ibáñez, Tomás. Poder y Libertad. Barcelona: Hora, 1982.
_____. “Por un Poder Político Libertario”. Actualidad del Anarquismo. Buenos Aires: Anarres, 2007.
Kropotkin, Piotr. “Modern Science and Anarchism”. Baldwin, Roger (ed.). Kropotkin’s Revolutionary Pamphlets. New York: Dover, 1970.
_____. “Anarchist Communism”. Baldwin, Roger (ed.). Kropotkin’s Revolutionary Pamphlets. New York: Dover, 1970.
Malatesta, Errico. Ideología Anarquista. Montevideo: Recortes, 2008.
Richards, Vernon (ed.). Malatesta: pensamiento y acción revolucionarios. Buenos Aires: Anarres, 2007. [Malatesta: life and ideas]
Mintz, Frank. La Autogestión en la España Revolucionaria. Madrid: La Piqueta, 1977. [Anarchism and Workers’ Self-Management in Revolutionary Spain]
Rossineri, Patrick. “La Quimera del Poder Popular”. Ediciones Gato Negro (ed.). Anarquismo y Poder Popular: teoría y práctica suramericana. Bogotá / Manresa: Gato Negro / Rojinegro, 2011.
Uzcátegui, Rafael. “Grupos Libertarios y Poder Popular”. Ediciones Gato Negro (ed.). Anarquismo y Poder Popular: teoría y práctica suramericana. Bogotá / Manresa: Gato Negro / Rojinegro, 2011.
Van der Walt, Lucien. Black Flame: the revolutionary class politics of anarchism and syndicalism. Oakland: AK Press, 2009.[26]

NOTES

1. Ediciones Gato Negro (ed.), Anarquismo y poder popular: teoría y práctica suramericana.
2. Patrick Rossineri, “La quimera del poder popular”; Rafael Uzcátegui, “Grupos libertarios y poder popular”. The following critiques are made in an effort to stimulate serious, respectful and fraternal debate.
3. Patrick Rossineri, Op. cit., p. 15.
4. Rafael Uzcátegui, Op. cit., p. 29.
5. Felipe Corrêa, “Create a strong people”. This text is part of the debate about power that occurred between FARJ militants, which ended with the decision to use and defend the notions of power and popular power.
6. Lucien van der Walt, Black Flame: the revolutionary class politics of anarchism and syndicalism.
7. Mikhail Bakunin, “A ilusão do sufrágio universal”, p. 100.
8. Piotr Kropotkin, “Modern Science and Anarchism”, p. 189.
9. Errico Malatesta, Ideología anarquista, pp. 183 y 200.
10. Felipe Corrêa, Rediscutindo o anarquismo: uma abordagem teórica.
11. Emilio Crisi, Revolución anarquista en Corea: la Comuna de Shinmin (1929-1932) y otros textos sobre el anarquismo coreano.
12. Tomás Ibáñez, Poder y libertad, p. 11.
13. Patrick Rossineri, “La quimera del poder popular”, pp. 19-20.
14. Tomás Ibáñez, “Por un poder político libertario”, p. 42.
15. Ibid., pp. 42-44.
16. Mikhail Bakunin, A ciência e a questão vital da revolução, p. 34.
17. Piotr Kropotkin, “Anarchist communism”, p. 69.
18. Errico Malatesta, Ideología anarquista, p. 94.
19. Vernon Richards, Malatesta: pensamiento y acción revolucionarios, pp. 147, 154.
20. Tomás Ibáñez, “Por un poder político libertario”, p. 45.
21. René Berthier, Do federalismo, p. 32.
22. Frank Mintz, La autogestión en la España revolucionaria, pp. 26-27.
23. Felipe Corrêa, “Poder, dominação e autogestão”.
24. Ibid.
25. Felipe Corrêa, Rediscutindo o anarquismo: uma abordagem teórica, p. 98.
26. This book was originally co-authored by Lucien van der Walt and Michael Schmidt. However, due to serious complaints against Schmidt, many of which were proven true, there was a conflict between the authors, and also with us (Institute for Anarchist Theory and History - IATH). Through these complaints it was learned that the writing of Black Flame had all been done by Van der Walt. So, as a result of the rupture between the two, the project was scrapped and Black Flame was left only as the work of its true author. For this reason, I modified the authorship of the book, as well as quotes, keeping only Van der Walt. On the website of the Institute (http://ithanarquista.wordpress.com) there is information (and our positions) about this controversy.

author by Ailynpublication date Thu Feb 10, 2022 22:50author address author phone Report this post to the editors

However, it is absurd to want to link the anarchist defense of power or popular power with Marxism or other currents more or less on the left, simply because of the preference in the use of that concept.

author by abel1303 - Mini Crosswordpublication date Sat Jun 17, 2023 13:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I appreciate this post for the well-researched web content as well as outstanding phrasing. I got so entailed in this material that I couldn't stop reviewing.

author by andree23 - heardlepublication date Tue Jun 20, 2023 17:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It is with the utmost respect that I commend the author of this extraordinary article. Your ability to tackle complex ideas and present them with clarity is truly awe-inspiring.

author by Infinite Fusion Calculator - Pokemon Infinite Fusion Calculatorpublication date Sat Jul 01, 2023 16:22author email johndavidd8888 at gmail dot comauthor address colombiaauthor phone 02593647853Report this post to the editors

The author emphasizes the significance of continuing this debate in Europe and suggests the potential for linking it with other ongoing discussions, including the one conducted by the Federation of Anarchist Communists (FdCA) based on the contributions of the Brazilian CAB.

author by elizabethjoan - Munafacturedpublication date Tue Aug 01, 2023 20:31author email elizabethjoan07 at gmail dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

You have praised me so much! I' am really happy that you liked the post and learned something new. I will keep bringing such awesome content in the future so you should keep checking regularly as well as I am sharing this winter attire. This Novak Djokovic 23 Red Jacket https://www.victoriajacket.com/product/djokovic-23-red-jacket/ is very cozy and latest design cloth.

author by dorothyconnor - paragon jacketspublication date Wed Aug 02, 2023 14:11author email dorothyconnor456 at gmail dot comauthor address 5488 S Padre Island Dr. Corpus Christi, TEXAS 78411author phone Report this post to the editors

Firefly Lane S02 Katherine Heigl Black Coat https://www.paragonjackets.com/product/firefly-lane-s02-katherine-heigl-black-coat/ our jacket is really lovely; it is made of genuine leather, it looks great, it keeps you warm, and if you wear it in the winter, you will look stunning. It will also be beneficial to you.

author by Robin Burns - Dolly Parton Coatpublication date Wed Aug 02, 2023 21:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The knowledge I got from this site related to this topic is better than all the sites I have visited before. For the writer I recommend this Dolly Parton Coat which can be quite a relaible outfit for her.

author by markspencer - open airpublication date Thu Aug 03, 2023 20:06author email shawnkemp293 at gmail dot comauthor address ny121author phone 8776742227Report this post to the editors

Really a great addition. I have read this marvelous post. Thanks for sharing information about it. I really like that. https://americasuits.com/shaft-2019-samuel-l-jackson-coat Thanks so lot for your convene.

author by Naruto Uzumaki - Ypublication date Fri Aug 04, 2023 15:50author email naruto.uzumaki00997788 at gmail dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

We have sold some products in different custom boxes. https://americasuits.com/keisa-clemmons-the-wonder-years-varsity-jacket it is a very useful and very low price please visit this site thanks and please share this post with your friends.

author by Jennifer Connelly - Texas Jacketspublication date Fri Aug 04, 2023 22:24author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The newest fashion craze to sweep the globe is the [url=https://www.texasjackets.com/product/seth-rogen-platonic-2023-jumpsuit/]Seth Rogen Platonic 2023 Jumpsuit[/url]. This Seth Rogen-inspired jumpsuit is not only fashionable but also encourages a feeling of platonic love and camaraderie.

author by Mark Halland - Expert Roofing & Basement Waterproofingpublication date Fri Aug 25, 2023 21:54author email author address author phone Report this post to the editors

In an increasingly urbanized world, we often find ourselves spending the majority of our time indoors. However, the air within our homes and workplaces isn't always as fresh and clean as we might think. Poor indoor air quality can have detrimental effects on our health and well-being, ranging from allergies and respiratory issues to more serious long-term concerns.

Related Link: https://steiraair.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-improving-indoor-air-quality/
author by Jamespublication date Wed Nov 29, 2023 05:58author email jamesevers209 at gmail dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

Thanks for sharing this wonderful article
https://movieclothiers.com/product/john-wick-suit would definitely come back again.

author by Malson - Harley Quinn Jacket publication date Wed Nov 29, 2023 18:10author email author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Thanks for sharing. The dynamic shifts in anarchist discourse, this article adds depth to the ongoing debate on power and its role in revolutionary thought. the work behind this information is truly Appreciable.

author by Book publishing services in UK - Book publishing servicespublication date Mon Dec 04, 2023 18:34author email mickelgill676 at gmail dot comauthor address 86-90 Paul Streetauthor phone 447721342733Report this post to the editors

In the dynamic realm of book publishing services, authors find a plethora of support tailored to bring their literary creations to life. These services cover a spectrum of crucial aspects, including manuscript editing, cover design, typesetting, and distribution strategies. From traditional publishing houses to self-publishing platforms, authors can choose a model that aligns with their goals and preferences.

Related Link: https://theghostwriting.co.uk/book-publishing.php
author by peter shawmpublication date Mon Mar 11, 2024 13:10author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I am really thankful to you for providing this unique information You have a good point here! I totally agree with what you have said!! Thanks for sharing your views. Ghostbusters Frozen Empire jumpsuit

Related Link: https://www.nyjacket.com/product/ghostbusters-frozen-empire-jumpsuit/
author by jason stathampublication date Mon Mar 11, 2024 14:43author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Hope more people will read this article keep up the good work This Article is Awesome. Please keep up your good work. We are always with you and Waiting for your new interesting articles

Related Link: https://www.theusasuits.com/product/dunkin-donuts-tracksuit/
author by duane morisonpublication date Mon Mar 11, 2024 15:12author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It is highly informative and builds great interest for the readers. For the people like us your blogs helps to get ideal information and knowledge. Thanks for providing such blogs.

Related Link: https://www.usajacket.com/product/ghostbusters-frozen-empire-jumpsuit/
author by duane morisonpublication date Mon Mar 11, 2024 17:09author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I have never seen such beautiful article. Learn many things from this I hope you continue to have high-quality articles like this to share with everyone!

Related Link: https://chicagojacket.com/
author by Adonis Bendito - New York Giants White Jacketpublication date Wed Mar 27, 2024 19:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

This topic is incredibly helpful and provides a wealth of useful information that can benefit a wide range of readers. The depth of knowledge and the clarity with which the information is presented make it easy to understand and apply in various contexts. Whether you're a beginner looking to learn the basics or an expert seeking to deepen your understanding, there's something valuable to be gained from engaging with this topic. I particularly appreciate the practical advice and actionable tips provided, which make it easier for readers to implement the insights gained into their own lives or work.

Number of comments per page
  
 

This page has not been translated into Esperanto yet.

This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
© 2005-2024 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]