Benutzereinstellungen

Neue Veranstaltungshinweise

International

Es wurden keine neuen Veranstaltungshinweise in der letzten Woche veröffentlicht

Kommende Veranstaltungen

International | Religion

Keine kommenden Veranstaltungen veröffentlicht

Sam Harris, New atheism and Islam

category international | religion | opinion / analysis author Donnerstag August 06, 2015 07:39author by Mazen Kamalmaz Report this post to the editors

This is a comment on the Sam Harris - Glenn Greenwald debate about Islam.


Sam Harris, New atheism and Islam


This is a comment on the Sam Harris - Glenn Greenwald debate about Islam; see :
http://www.samharris.org/blog/category/islam
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/03/sa...nimus

I think that the Harris - Greenwald debate missed the main issue of the matter they debated, that is Islam and Muslims. We could agree with the poll quoted by Greenwald, that only 7 % of Muslims are radicals, and religiously devoted. And that the rest (93% of Muslims) are moderate and good. But unfortunately both writers wasted their time arguing about the goodness of this 93%, while I think that the whole issue related only to the other 7%, who neither argued about their "goodness". For Islamists, those 7% of Muslims, they used this debate only to stigmatize ant criticism of their dogmas as racism and bigotry, etc. But I don't think that convinced and devoted Nazi or fascists never exceed 7 % of German or Italian population at any time. And that the remaining 93% were always moderate and good, even when they were used by the ruling 7% to inflict atrocities on others.

Being controlled, brainwashed and suppressed themselves, they became tools in the hands of the 7% to suppress and control others. What we saw in Iraq after 2003 and in Syria and Libya after 2012, that this 7% claimed superiority and hegemony over the rest (the 93%) , as self-proclaimed, sole representative of the divine, the sacred. They assume moral and intellectual authority over others, then using this authority, combined with brutal force; to suppress the rest, who couldn't fight back properly. In fact , both Harris and Greenwald are dangerous representatives of their ideas. Harris didn't hide that his atheism is an authoritarian, Euro-centric one; as he called for repressive measures to counter the Islamist fundamentalist threat. In fact , this type of atheism is not new to Middle East or "Islamic" countries, where generations of autocrats and dictators practiced such atheism for a long time now. Not only that any "victory" won by such measures was only a false and transient one, but that this authoritarian atheism has no libertarian content at all, it is just another dogma to support some brutal and harsh dictators.

Greenwald is also a dangerous "friend" of the 93% of Muslims, whose goodness he wishes to prove. By underestimating the threat of the 7% on this good majority, and the potential of using Islam as undisputed justification of the hegemony of this 7% upon the rest of Muslims and upon other minorities and neighbors of Muslim societies, Greewald is not of real help to this 93% he wishes to defend... Finally , it is true that Harris questions (1) that the present situation of Muslim countries could be Euro-centric or even racist, but they are very serious ones, that dismissing them simply as being racist is a lost opportunity for the 93% of Muslims to look thoroughly in their present and try to find deeper answers to such serious questions....


(1.) Harris questioned basic and fundamental beliefs of Islam as being inhuman, anti-freedom. He wondered that if Saddam's dictatorship was the only possible barrier against sectarian Sunni-Shi'a war or the rise of fundamentalists, this would tell how bleak and miserable Islamic societies are.

author by Peculiarmanpublication date Mi Aug 12, 2015 12:18author email author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Spot on. Do some YouTube presentations of your well spoken opinions. I'll subscribe, maybe.

 
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
George Floyd: one death too many in the “land of the free”

International | Religion | en

Di 01 Dez, 20:02

browse text browse image

textRatzinger pope - a return to reality 01:23 Fr 22 Apr by Federazione dei Comunisti Anarchici 0 comments

FdCA statement on the election of Ratzinger

textLate contemplations about the Charlie Hebdo massacre Mär 24 by Mazen Kamalmaz 0 comments

The attack on Charlie Hebdo last January was carefully designed to the full benefit of IS, but also to the benefit of the ruling Elite in the advanced capitalist world. It was not intended as punishment for Charlie Hebdo's satiric attitude toward what IS considers as "sacred", but as punishment for millions of Muslims who accepted such an attitude by their silence, especially Muslims who live in France and the west. IS, like everyone else, knew very well that Muslims in Europe and the west will be under heavier pressure after such an attack. IS offered Muslims only one way to defend themselves: to accept its fundamentalist hyper-dogmatic version of Islam and join its ranks - martyrdom and heaven through killing and suicide bombing. The message of IS was clear: freedom of conscience and expression is never a part of Muslims' identity, so it must be declined, denied and fought against. Both IS and the western elite accepted this as a "fact". [Italiano]

imageFrancis I and the conservative modesty Aug 10 by Bruno Lima Rocha 1 comments

Jorge Mario Bergoglio comes from within the working class amidst the splendor and belligerent Buenos Aires of the '30s. He is the son of an Italian Piedmontese immigrant couple, his father was a railman and his mother worked at home. Unlike most of his countrymen, he shared parts of popular culture, but not the values of organized labor at the time. Not by a long way had his education been crossed either by the ideas of the left or of Peronism. Hence in Argentina, even now at the height of "papamania" (“pope-mania”), the most famous fan of San Lorenzo de Almagro football club is seen both as a conservative and a man of the people.

imageThe Vatican's "New Course" Jul 11 by Lucio Garofalo 0 comments

The latest goings-on in the Vatican demonstrate that it was by no means absurd to think that Ratzinger's resignation had something to do with the internal rows between various factions (first and foremost Opus Dei) that have been ripping the Roman Curia apart over the question of the IOR, the Vatican's bank. [Italiano]

imageHabemus Papam: Let him who is without sin cast the first stone Mär 19 by Facundo Guillén 0 comments

Regarding the election of Bergoglio as the new pope, Luis D'Elía said: "Francis I is for Latin America what John Paul II was for the Soviet Union. The new aim of the empire to destroy South American unity".
Without actually embracing this point of view, this comparison manages to capture an essential element: cracks are becoming apparent in the former bastion of Catholicism. With the advance of the evangelical churches, Latin American Catholicism has lost the monopoly on religion. [Castellano]

textGods and Popes Dez 08 by Jack Grancharoff 0 comments

“What we take for granted” is written by Jack Grancharoff. For orders by donation and more details write to: P.O. BOX 6012, Quaama, NSW 2550, Australia.

more >>

textRatzinger pope - a return to reality Apr 22 0 comments

FdCA statement on the election of Ratzinger

© 2005-2020 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]