user preferences

New Events

International

no event posted in the last week
Recent articles by Terence
This author has not submitted any other articles.
Recent Articles about International Culture

“En el acuario de Facebook”: Radiografía de la distratención Nov 14 12 by José Luis Carretero

“Nosso prédio vale mais que dois dólares a ação” Jun 04 12 by Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos sobre a Globalização

Televicracia Mar 28 12 by Fernando Buen Abad Domínguez

Free Software as Part of the Anarchist Toolkit

category international | culture | opinion / analysis author Wednesday June 27, 2007 17:46author by Terence Report this post to the editors

Software direct action gets the goods

This article presents the case that the phenomena of free software is an important tool in pushing forward anarchist ideals and raising awareness in the wider public through example.


Free Software as Part of the Anarchist Toolkit


Background History

The way we write software both now and in the past is heavily influenced by the history of software and computers. People tend to think as software being a recent phenomena, which it is and thus they do not tend to think in terms of histories. Its as if not a long enough time period has elapsed for history to begin.

The beginnings of software got off to a relatively slow start and was restricted to a very limited number of individuals, although they made huge progress and contributions. It wasn't really until the late 70's and onwards into the 80's that it became something, done by masses of people to the present situation where perhaps a million or more people now write software.

Looking back at the roots of computers and software, we can see that their primary usage then was largely of mathematical origin as were the immediate goals. The people involved at the beginning were nearly all either mathematicians, physicists and engineers. Much like the development of science and scientific knowledge, information and ideas were shared and in the early days of software, much of it was shared and given away free. In certain respects then, it paralleled the trajectory of science.

With the arrival of the personnel computer (PC), companies started charging for software. However there were clearly some people who were not happy with this development and whether it was a result of it or not, or just a spontaneous thing, the Free Software movement of open source and freeware got started and quickly flourished. In the early days, programs were shared by floppy disks and even through listings in PC magazines like 'Byte' for example. With the arrival of the Internet and widespread availability of modems, bulletin boards and other such sites (e.g. the famous SimTel site) become the dominant means of sharing software. And with the arrival of the Web there are hundreds if not thousands of websites offering free software.

In many ways though this idea of giving 'information' is not new. One could argue that for thousands of years folk music was and largely still is free, where musicians are free to copy and modify songs and music as they see fit. Only in recent times has music become more commercial and fenced off under the banner of private property through the legal invention called copyright. Still though that does not prevent literally millions of people from playing music themselves and creating it via their own instruments. Had music been copyrighted from day one it is certain that we would have never have the rich heritage of traditional music found all over the world.

The same applies to the progress and advancement of science. There would basically be none. What if, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell and many others, had patented their discoveries?

We are in a similar position with software, except thankfully we have not been fenced in yet, although software patents are capitalism's current battering ram to crush the movement and fence off intellectual ideas.

The Nature of Software. What is it?

And this brings us neatly to the idea of software and what it really is? It could be defined in various ways depending on where you are coming from. So if you were writing a mathematical program, you might call it an algorithm which was a common enough term not so long ago. A slightly different perspective might describe it as a state machine bringing in the notion of its roots in logic and logic processing.

Getting more philosophical one might simply say software is information or can be representative of an idea harking back to the algorithm concept. Some might argue that describing software as information is incorrect, but to some extent we can think of HTML (used for creating web pages) or XML as both a program or state-data and at the same time as information. Since we mentioned music earlier, it is worth returning to it. About 50 years ago most people would have described music as sound but now in this age of CDs and MP3 players, it can definitely be thought of as data. As the data stream from a MP3 file is processed by a piece of software it can produce music, although we would all agree it is necessary to produce sound, we would also all agree that the characteristics of that piece of music is embodied in the data.

So where does all that leave software? Probably nowhere extra special really and it is just another variant and in the same category as information, music (+video) and ideas. The universe of information is different to the physical world of stuff, because in the physical world you have to get stuff, it tends to be fixed in size, takes up lots of space, is very finite (e.g. gold) and takes lots of energy and time to lug it around. That makes sharing difficult and means there will always be limited supplies.

Not so with information, where you can have as much as you want for very little effort and it can be passed around to everyone with tremendous ease and little cost. All of this obviously makes it much harder to control as opposed to the physical world where it is easier to hold territory and horde resources which might explain the much better success that capitalism has had in taking the commons (land) and privatising it thus denying people the ability to sustain themselves and therefore make them dependent on capitalists for survival.

The Means of Production in our Hands

If we take a Marxists view of software in relation to work or the economy, then it is another angle on the means of production and it's social consequences. As everyone knows, capitalists through owning the means of production (i.e. factories and machines) control it and make the workers dependent on them, since they already, as stated above, took away their means of growing their own food. By owning the means of production, it gives capitalists a big role in determining the uses that the outputs of industry will be put to and the resulting wider social effects. In this respect it might be worth considering the priority and large amount of resources given over by capitalism to the production of things like cars, tanks, fighter aircraft, missiles and nuclear weapons. It might be counter argued the former USSR produced these things, but then again that was a State Capitalist system. However the common denominator being that it is the tiny minority of those in power (in the case of the USSR) or the owners of capital that make the decisions. Not only that, this power is nearly always unaccountable too.

Contrast this with the fruits of the free software movement so far, where the means of production is back in the hands of the ordinary people -well programmers at least but who are not driven by the motive of profit but seem instead to be acting out the human values of creativity, inquisitiveness and solidarity and sharing. Instead of the destructive products some of which were listed above, I think it would be fair to say that the products produced have enhanced human culture, and helped in the exchanged of ideas and further advancement of communication amongst and between people directly. When I say this, I am thinking of course of software like the Mozilla/Firefox browser, Apache webserver (reckoned 50% of all webservers are run on Apache), Perl and PHP programming languages, various free music players, email programs (Mozilla Thunderbird), ftp software, wikis, blogs, free publishing tools, free image, video and audio players and editing tools (gvim) and loads of other stuff. And of course Linux. And this has not been restricted to just the English speaking Western world because a lot of this software has been translated into numerous languages and the benefits of this intellectual capital is available to all the countries of the world.

And yet potentially this is really only the beginning.

The Current Situation

Already at this juncture there is a vast array of sites and tools to push the evolution of the free software movement further along. For example there are sites like sourceforge.net that offer free disk space for hosting free software projects and there are thousands of websites and email lists and forums.

The amount of free software and projects seems to be growing all the time and the number and range of ideas is huge where it seems each success seems to inspire and spur others on. It ought to be acknowledged though that most projects are small and not very active, while the number of big and successful projects is small but they do tend to have relatively big impact.

Briefly dwelling on the negatives, Capitalism is well aware of the potential threat that free software represents whether that be directly to profits or to long term objectives like the control of information and ideas. Free software is fundamentally at odds with the nature of capitalism, but it would be fool hardy to not accept that capitalism can be and is very flexible in accommodating and ultimately co-opting any of the threats it faces, as it has done throughout the 20th century. We have to be ever vigilant against the dead hand of control.

What's more, humanity is at a turning point because we are faced with a number of grave issues all coming together simultaneously. In large measure these would be the current 6th mass extinction event as agreed by 400 of the worlds top biologists and ecologists 1 and which we are experiencing in the biosphere as we speak. The second issue is global warming where now the consensus of atmospheric scientists seems to indicate we will experience not just the low end of the forecast, but the medium scale warming of up to 4odegrees globally. And in the past few years, there is increasing discussion amongst leading atmospheric scientists that we are in danger of triggering the high end of the forecast with 6+ degrees and that would be a direct threat to continuation of the species. (For example it is estimated without global warming as part of the mass extinction we will lose ~50% of species. Including global warming brings those estimates up into the 60% to 70% bracket.) The third issue is Peak Oil 2 and the long term consequences for industrial society.

So the question is, should we fail the above challenges and humanity enters a long slide downwards and the decay of industrial society, will this era of rapid global communications, vast amounts of digital storage and spare time to write software -disappear, only to be a short lived and unique phenomena in the history of humankind? In other words will the problems we face overwhelm the infrastructure needed to support all these technologies? (And which is suggested in the original Club of Rome reports. These were published in the 1970s and identified not just resource limits, but the possibility of a pollution crisis too as overwhelming industrial society and causing its downfall.) Of course the answer won't be found here but I think a small part of finding the solution is in fact here in the form of free software.

For free software has two roles. 1) and it is doing this already, is to make available the tools to spread out and share information as widely and as easily as possible, thereby making society more informed and achieving rapid (and needed) culture change and 2) to help the transformation from the current fragmentary representative and badly functioning democracy to one of participatory democracy. This is of course very much along the lines of what Anarchism is about. And I say participatory because it is in the nature of free software that it encourages people to get involved in whatever way is possible for them. To achieve such a transformation on the wider scale, requires people to have already tried the equivalent or similar at the smaller scale and to become familiar with it. And free software is potentially one of those opportunities. Wikipedia is one of those things that springs to mind in drawing people in to participate and add their worth.

Forging Ahead and Creating Alternative Futures

Returning to one of the core features of free software that of controlling what you produce; this very much ties in with the slogan: Another world is possible. Indeed it is and many of those who repeat this slogan often talk about how there ought to be more democracy and giving people voices. As we've seen already when we have that, the results are really good. Free software is all about this and has already produced the goods. At this stage, events in the world of information should be influencing the physical world and inspiring people to action. Others might caution that since these are quite different domains, we should not be drawing lessons and coming to the wrong conclusions. Well that's too weak an argument to do nothing.

In earlier times, during the Industrial Revolution and probably a time when there was a greater sense of community than is currently the case in any part of suburbia, there were many voluntary groups that arose to provide free services. Examples are the early Fire Brigades, Ambulances and Lifeboats. Over the years these functions have been taken over by the State, but certainly that Anarchist spirit was there even if the people involved didn't think of it that way. Around the same time many charities sprung up and again these reflect the inherent human traits that some people have for sharing, empathy and so forth, although one could argue on an intellectual level these were often co-opted even to this day by religious notions. It is to this tradition that we need to rekindle these ideas amongst the wider public but in new forms applicable to society today. And so we need to start the process of migrating, these ideas and concepts of free software to which more and more people are exposed and familiar with in their daily lives, across to the real (physical) world.

And one of the leading ideas that comes to mind is the freecycle groups which are basically email lists for local regions where people can offer up things for giving away free like furniture, clothes, books, or whatever. Presumably it is things they no longer need or have a use for. But it does represent a foothold in the physical world of free software concepts, largely because in people's minds it is associated with the Internet, PCs and software since the email list is the thing that glues it altogether.

Further ideas are free travel on public transport which actually exists very sporadically in places (Perth?, Australia), although free travel for certain groups of people like old age pensioners is more common (e.g. Ireland) and indeed very liberating for them. Free public transport is something that can be pushed much harder now by using the argument that it would cut down oil consumption and CO-2 emissions immediately, unlike waiting and paying a fortune for magic technologies to be invented and save us. It is something that can be done right now. While it makes a lot of sense, we all know that without the big push it will not be accepted, because in the present scheme only solutions that don't challenge capitalism can be accepted or even considered.

We also have the age old concept of public libraries and many of these have extended this concept by providing free Internet access. For the person who is technically oriented, these days many firms and corporations get rid of their old PCs that are more than about 4 or 5 years old because they are not powerful enough to run the latest bloated Microsoft software. Refitting these PCs entirely with free software can give you a very useable PC that will allow you to email and surf the Internet. These could then be made available to those who don't have the finances to buy one.

As the saying goes teach a man to fish and you can feed him every day, although I guess that does not take on board the notion of depleting fish stocks. Likewise the Internet and free software could play a role here by helping to setup websites and provide the details for people to self learn and share ideas on how to maintain and repair things from everyday things like bikes, washing machines and the vast range of DIY skills from plumbing, carpentry, building and electrical skills. How many times have you tried to fix something but can't because you are either not skilled enough or don't know what to do next? Currently the barricade of copyright prevents people from posting detailed diagrams and information about the workings of various machines. If we could help open this up, it could provide the means to slowdown the consumerism and the throwaway attitude so prevalent. It would also mean especially for those who perhaps can't afford a new bike or washing machine or whatever nor can afford to pay someone to fix it, that we provide them with the means to do it themselves. We need wikiMechanic, wikiRepair, wikiDiY etc.

On the education front, the Internet and free software provide huge opportunities. They are an effective means for creating self help, educational groups and resources and importantly provide a viable if not alternative, then certainly additional aid to the state education system which so often fails many. Indeed if you read the writings of John Gatto 3 you will come to realize State education is not about producing intellectually stimulated people at all.

So as we can see the concept of free software easily and already has transferred over to the idea of providing knowledge (and education) for free. As hinted earlier, this activity to some extent predates free software, but is obviously extremely effective with the Internet. Into this field, coming directly from the free software domain, has been the creation of Wikipedia and all it's variants as alluded to above. Again while there are some valid criticisms of them, they would seem to be quite beneficial and most importantly useful and available to all. Not only that they have taken participation by the public to a new level. wikitravel.org is a good example of where most people could probably add something. Not exactly politically revolutionary but yet another working example of how sharing, mass participation and making things free, benefits everyone.

Other wikipedia like possibilities are undertakings like the "California Coastlines" website which is an online catalogue of digital images of the entire coastline and has proved invaluable to environmentalists. Similar projects could easily be initiated for other things that people value. This might be a good time to photograph the view of and view from every mountain top in your area before wind turbines surely dominate the landscape. Most importantly though with so many people with digital cameras, it gets them all involved and suddenly they will feel a greater sense of concern if that thing they photographed and put online for the world to see, is threatened. And thats the key, to get people to actually do something, because after the first step, they are more like to do more and think about things a bit more.

Another concept worth discussing, is the annual CoastWatch survey that takes place in Europe every autumn to survey the coastlines and is carried out by ordinary members of the public (walking along beaches) using a standard form for reporting. (It is not clear if it is still taking place, but did so through most of the 1990s). It is relevant here because it involves the public in both science and environmental protection, monitoring and education in an active rather than passive way. Apparently similar one off type of events have been done for counting particular species of butterflies and birds. People might laugh at such things if they don't interest them and they also might seem trivial, but the more of this type of activity, the more it will spread out into other areas and the result will be the beginnings of a society where regularly thousands and thousands of people work together for an overall good and not for any commercial benefit. And these sort of things are ideally advertised and coordinated by the Internet and free software. The rapid increase in access to broadband and availability of webcams makes this coordination amongst groups even easier. In general if people get involved in something, anything, then the more likely they will with other things because those first steps often break down many barriers and frequently opens up new possibilities in their mind.

The Role of Access to Resources in the Real World and Virtual World

Capitalists have always had huge resources at their disposal. In general that is one of the main characteristics of power in that you control resources. This is normally in the form of armies, industrial capacity or in this context computing power and storage. Battles of all kind tend to be about who has the most resources and in the case of war your industrial capacity can be a good correlator of your chances of winning. In our everyday physical world of the state we as individuals are hopelessly at a disadvantage because the resources at the State's command are vastly greater than the individual. Only through our own organisations can we gain any sort of chance of something remotely approaching an equal footing. Hence it always has been and always will be in the state's interest to co-opt and crush the movements and organisations of the people, the prime example because of its historical importance being the unions. And as any activist knows it always tries to stop any type of movement growing from a small group of people, chiefly by preventing it from getting any decent media coverage and intimidating members in all sorts of shadowy ways away from mainstream public gaze, when those issues are of great importance. It goes without saying that our greatest resource is our large numbers and that too has been addressed by measures to divide by (socio-economic) class and the careful maintenance of the manufacture of consent through the media to control our knowledge of our own situation and preventing us from acting on our predicament.

Thankfully in the software world it is not quite as bad. We through peer to peer networks, sharing of computers can leverage large resources in terms of communications, computing power and storage. One should not be totally naive though and remain unaware of how agencies like the NSA can hoover up and tap as much as that information as they wish. Again though we probably outnumber them in the number of people now engaged in the free software movement and the creativity within it. Creativity is not lacking in the non free software world, but it is more likely to be stifled and left untapped. Overall though the state almost certainly still has the upper hand in this domain too. And obviously most people involved in free software are not anarchists nor think of themselves as such, just to make that point clear.

Nevertheless this pleasant and perhaps temporary period where we have more equal access (than normal) and crucially control of resources means we can circumvent some of the chains put on us in the real world, namely our ability to organise and the means to breakout of the walled gardens of news and information and escape the framing of debates and shaping of public opinion. But we must be ever vigilant because continually the capitalist system is trying to impose new rules to control the Internet and free software and each time an initiative is rejected, it relentlessly tries a new approach.

Conclusion

The free software movement has unwittingly presented the peoples of the world with an important tool to avail of, on the frontlines of democracy. Many of those previously and currently engaged in the free software movement are unlikely to be fully aware of the consequences and benefits of their work and may still be living in the fantasy belief world of neo-liberalism, free markets, trickle down economics, endless growth, domination and mindless consumerism. This is simply because many of the participants just do it ( -i.e. write code) and are not in any formal way a member of anything in particular, or politically motivated. Undoubtedly global capitalism has also fed off the free software movement and gained its own benefits, but on balance it would seem it has been positive to ordinary people too.

It is clear that most people like and want to be part of something constructive and it is inspiring projects and ideas about the future that are always more appealing than the often necessary dwelling on the negatives. And this is something we need to tap into.

The next stage of development of the free software movement most likely will be just as important as the last, but it is incumbent on us all to get involved to some degree to protect the gains we have made and push it even further and help usher in the rapid cultural change needed to get society to make the necessary change to go down the path of sustainability and survive.

Note: The software running the Anarkismo site, Oscailt, is free software.

References:
1. 6th Mass Extinction underway
See also: "Animal Extinction - the greatest threat to mankind", The Independent, 30th Apr 2007
2. See lots of articles on www.EnergyBulletin.net
3. Google John Gatto and The Underground History of American Education or see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Taylor_Gatto
4. California Coastlines See also 'The Ecologist's article on it: Saving Malibu from the stars
5. Hesperian www.hesperian.org produce free publishing for health and empowerment. They started with Where there is no doctor
6. Since writing the article the author has discovered the existence of www.wikiversity.org and www.wikibooks.org although the latter have refused to allow the creation of a book on Anarchism as it breaks their neutral viewpoint rule.
7. See also: http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2007/2007_Hansen_etal_2.pdf titled: 'Climate Change and Trace Gases' by James Hansen et al, where scientific evidence is presented we are possibly on the threshold of a dangerous climate flip over.

author by Mike Avalospublication date Thu Jun 28, 2007 09:59Report this post to the editors

The article is good at pointing out the similarities of science and software. I agree with him in that making both of them public goods available for all without the State enforcing any restrictions on their development will allow for more innovations and improvements impossible otherwise and also speed up those that are possible despite restrictions. The same could be said of all immaterial goods, culture in general.

We should clearly separate this from the funding of this research and work because one of the arguments against it is that without enforcing copyright there would be no profits and thus no funding. This is false as even in capitalism software is not produced only by specialized companies but in-house for special needs of other industries. This has led to corporate support of many software projects in wich even companys that compete in other areas cooperate for "the common good" (their good from their perspective as it is a more efficient use of resources to pool them with others who share the same goal).

I would add that the idea of the amateur hacker working in solitude for "love of the art" or to "scratch and itch" while true in most projects at first once they become great succeses or show big potential and get the backing of some giant, it leaves place to professionally dedicated and equally talented programmers (who may even love what they do). This does not mean that the kind of "scratch an itch" motivations stop (they are probably the source of many, if not most, small "incremental" contributions) but they lose terrain.

Obviously, in socialism we would have this as well as companies specifically dedicated to developing software (and doing research, and art, etc) funded through different means and we would have this mixture of amateur and professional work or "main" ocuppation and "hobby" work. But we would probably also have a reorientation of the focus of developments and researchs. In medicine, an obvious case would be the search for cures and treatments to "poormen diseases" like malaria, chagas, etc wich currently are not profitable and thus investigated with marginal funding even when there are millions of badly affected persons.

But now to the disagreements, he says:

"Briefly dwelling on the negatives, Capitalism is well aware of the potential threat that free software represents whether that be directly to profits or to long term objectives like the control of information and ideas. Free software is fundamentally at odds with the nature of capitalism, but it would be fool hardy to not accept that capitalism can be and is very flexible in accommodating and ultimately co-opting any of the threats it faces, as it has done throughout the 20th century. We have to be ever vigilant against the dead hand of control."

By what I wrote before it is clear that I do not see free software as a threat to capitalism, nor even a hindrance. It may actually help strenghten it because while profits for some may lower because of it, this also means lower costs for others. Overall It will produce a sum zero rearrangements of the profitabilities of certain industries and nothing else.

That is not to say that it is wothless from an anarchist communist revolutionary point of view. It is like a cooperative (in the best cases) with all its highs and lows, its potentialities and limitations. We should understand this, use that knowledge to show that cooperation is better but not attribute it some subversive potential.

Also, we should look at attempts to restrict the uses of technology in ways that could hinder us but that is a different matter more close to surveillance issues and civil liberties.

Some people like software and they also like some politics, and they look for links between them and they fin them. Both real ones, and false ones. Let´s try to be calm headed and well centered, it will help us a lot with propaganda work. The same could be said of Kropotkin trying to mix anarchim and science. You can read Malatesta´s excellent comments on that, altough I myself am a materialist and don´t see the contradiction he sees between considering anarchism a moral beleif and that.

Excellent site, possible because of free software by the way.

author by Chris F. - http://www.binaryfreedom.infopublication date Thu Jun 28, 2007 14:00Report this post to the editors

I like the article..
if anyone will like to join a free software activist
group mainly(but not all) form by left inclined people
join http://www.binaryfreedom.info

Thanks

Related Link: http://www.binaryfreedom.info
author by Stomfipublication date Thu Jun 28, 2007 18:31author email stomfi at bigpond dot comReport this post to the editors

Putting the means of production and the means of distribution in the hands of the many is called Socialism, and is an organized form of Government, with elected representation and leaders to make decisions affecting the people.

Anarchy on the other hand means no government, where mobs or collections of people make decisions that affect themselves, swapping points of view and sides at will. Social anarchy adopts certain social rules of behavior and sends to Coventry those that break the rules.

To create such a system that worked, everyone would have to agree to spend short rostered periods of their life doing necessary services and bureaucratic functions. Short rostered periods avoid power groups forming as anarchy suffers from a power vacuum.

I don't think that the whole world is intelligent enough for social anarchy just yet, so we'll have to be content with Socialism organized by benign dictators like Linus.

author by Terencepublication date Thu Jun 28, 2007 19:41Report this post to the editors

Firstly thanks for the comments. You write that:
>....that I do not see free software as a threat to capitalism...

Its probably more the other way around. Actually I agree that free software probably helps capitalism. Often its the case that it is progressive leftist advances that give it a new lease of life. For example, we could argue that the fight for better working conditions and wages in the late 1800s and early 1900s gave people the extra income to create the consumer society from which capitalism definitely benefited.

I see the same thing here. Without the whole freedom and free access (once online) of the internet, none of it would have happened. You just have to look at the way capitalism has dealth with Internet access over the mobile phone network. They made it really restrictive and costly and it definitely hasn't worked out the way they wanted, which was to make a pile of cash by charging for everything. Actually there could have been a great range of things that it could have been used for but thats for another day.

Given the chance they would do the exact same for the Internet. Micropayments has been the holy grail of some companies and the very strong efforts to get rid of Net Neutrality (basically equal priority access) to the Internet by the Telecos could be the very thing it arrives in on the back of.

Regarding the point about the amateur hacker thing, I would agree that to do a good job of writing software or whatever, does require more time, but at this juncture I think what the whole free software thing along with wikis and all the rest of it does, is that it opens up the realization to potentially millions of people, through direct action as it were rather than theoretical musings, that we the masses can do many useful things on our own, that we can cooperate, that we don't need bosses and managers, the profit motive is not the only motive in the world and we can decide what we will make (well write) and want to do. In consumer society there few opportunities encounter these things, because so much of everything else we do is via some kind of commercial transaction.

Perhaps we can draw the analogy with the earlier industrial times, where thousands worked side by side in awful conditions, it allowed an awakening that it can be better than this and the shared experience was the necessary precursor for people to work and cooperate together to strike and fight for better conditions.

Likewise then, I would see the participation in all this free software stuff as igniting that same spirit amongst people considering there are very few other mechanisms left open that can allow a shared experience amongst thousands that is not managed under the guise of private entreprise.

Lastly, you raise an interesting point about attempts to restrict the uses of technology. I suppose one can argue that anonymous proxy servers and emailers are a partial response to that, although I would add there is very strong suspicion that many of these are fronts used by the various intelligence services. The fight against copyright can probably also been seen as a component of the fight back against restrictive technology.

author by Terencepublication date Wed Feb 20, 2008 21:10Report this post to the editors

Towards the end of the above article I argue that software and the Internet can possibly tilt some of the power back into the hands of the people.

I have now found a possible contender in the form of the site www.wikileaks.org

Unfortunately the domain name has been removed in an attempt to ban it, but it can still be reached using the IP address.

http://88.80.13.160/wiki/Wikileaks

In the "About" page it says:

....In an important sense, Wikileaks is the first intelligence agency of the people...

Related Link: http://88.80.13.160/wiki/Wikileaks:About
 
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
Issue #3 of the Newsletter of the Tokologo African Anarchist Collective

International | Culture | en

Thu 02 Oct, 04:21

browse text browse image

Sorry, no stories matched your search, maybe try again with different settings.

imageWho killed Facundo Cabral? Jul 28 by José Antonio Gutiérrez D. 0 comments

For us you have not died Facundo of the enriching verse. For us you live on within those who fight, in those who think for themselves, in those who stand up and oppose dictatorships just as they do age old prejudices. Side by side with other minstrels of free song, such as Victor Jara, just as many others whose song is a never ending chain in which each link holds the song of the rest. For us you have not died Facundo of the enriching verse. For us you live on within those who fight, in those who think for themselves, in those who stand up and oppose dictatorships just as they do age old prejudices. Side by side with other minstrels of free song, such as Victor Jara, just as many others whose song is a never ending chain in which each link holds the song of the rest. [Castellano] [Italiano]

textRupert Murdoch and the Western Media Oct 19 by Rory Moore 0 comments

Murdoch's Empire is not simply just a commercial profit–fuelled industry, but a tool and psychological weapon that is used to cater for acceptance of a certain political agenda.If we, as a movement want people to support our ideas and begin to realise the true ills of capitalism, they have to become aware of people like Rupert Murdoch, and the power individuals it can have over influencing the way people think

textGlimpses into 2100 Feb 06 by Ilan Shalif 2 comments

Introduction: These "glimpses" are a way to make the world commune of communities that go to make up the libertarian communist society a little less abstract...
They are based on the big experiment of the kibbutzes - the (almost) century-long commune movement in Palestine/Israel - and on my involvement with it since age 7, and my experience living on kibbutzes between the ages 16 to 32. Nearly none of the members of the kibbutzes were libertarian communists. Most were first and foremost naZionists of various trends. But, until it started to deteriorate, internal relations among the kibbutz members were of a libertarian communist kind and decision-making was mainly done through direct democracy. (Currently, most kibbutzes are in the process of privatization.)

textThe Transitions of the Social Revolution Oct 26 by Jedi 0 comments

A discussion of the relevence of culture work in developing the social revolution. A theoretical framework that challenges nationalism, religion, and other forms of the state with an Anarchist Communist perspective.

textFilm Review: The Edukators May 10 by James R 0 comments

The Edukators comes bundled with enough hype and hope to prompt you into the IFI of an evening instead of lazily borrowing from your mates pirated DVD collection. Billed in reviews left, right and centre as an exposition of the political angst of a generation, the film provides a brief glance into the lives of Jan, (Daniel Bruhl), Peter, (Stipe Erceg) and Jule, (Julia Jentsch). Together they are three radicalised young Berliners, coping with the alienation of daily life in the city.

more >>
Sorry, no press releases matched your search, maybe try again with different settings.
© 2005-2014 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]