user preferences

Recent articles by Ella Powers
This author has not submitted any other articles.
Recent Articles about International Economy

The State and the power of Business Mar 08 21 by Zaher Baher

Shock en el Mercado Petrolero. Caos en el Laberinto Apr 30 20 by José Luis Carretero Miramar.

Here Comes Bourgeois Socialism – Again Apr 28 20 by Dimitris Fasfalis

The Central American Free Trade Agreement

category international | economy | opinion / analysis author Tuesday May 10, 2005 21:11author by Ella Powers - NAF Report this post to the editors

Analysis from USA anarchists

The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) was signed last year by Bush administration officials after trade ministers in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic completed negotiations with the United States. (CAFTA is modeled after the North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA, but will include both goods and services.)

Under CAFTA(as under NAFTA) laws protecting labor, the environment and consumers would be in jeopardy if they are seen as 'barriers to trade'. The oversight of these agreements is outside of state and local governance, and unelected trade tribunals operating on the investment rules of specific trade agreements. Lawsuits related to free trade under NAFTA are costing U.S., Canadian, and Mexican taxpayers millions of dollars and jeopardizing our ability to maintain basic human rights. CAFTA will likely be submitted to the Congress for ratification this spring, as soon as its supporters feel they have a potential majority. As the ratification process begins, we must hold our elected Oregon representatives accountable and urge them to vote 'no' on CAFTA.

NAFTA resulted in the loss of 900,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs; at least 14,000 of these job losses occurred here in Oregon. One recent example of how free trade policies are affecting Oregon is the closing of the Amalgamated Sugar Company’s beet processing operation in Nyssa, OR. A press release from Amalgamated stated "trade pressure from foreign producers" as a major factor in the decision to close the plant that has operated for 67 years and employed between 167 and 260 Oregonians. The consequences of NAFTA on the Mexican economy are just as dramatic. Large corporations have effectively decimated small and medium sized businesses. 1.5 million agricultural workers have been displaced. Farms were run out of business by subsidized corn from the United States. Now, deprived of their livelihoods, these Mexican farmers have become economic migrants in search of maquilla jobs. They are making increasingly desperate efforts to cross the border into the U.S. Workers in both the U.S., Canada and Mexico have suffered under NAFTA. CAFTA will prove to be even more devastating.

Under NAFTA, our public services and crucial social, labor, and environmental regulations have been under constant attack from greedy corporations. Closed trade tribunals rule on law suits concerning state and local policies that corporations see as 'barriers to trade'. Recent cases involve UPS, Metalclad and the Canadian Cattle Association. UPS is seeking $160 million in compensation from Canada, claiming that its government-run parcel delivery system undermines UPS market share. Canadian cattle producers are using NAFTA to demand $300 million in compensation from U.S. taxpayer funds, claiming that the Canadian cattle import ban instituted after mad cow disease was found in Canadian beef violates their NAFTA rights.

Under NAFTA Metalclad sued the Mexican government after the municipality of Guadalcazar denied Metalclad a construction permit. Metalclad wanted to build a toxic waste disposal facility on a site that was already contaminated with 20,000 tons of toxic waste, but the community wanted the area cleaned up before any new facilities were permitted. Metalclad was awarded $15.6 million in compensation, to be paid by the Mexican government. With only 11 of the 42 cases finalized, some $35 million in taxpayer funds have been granted to these five corporations that have succeeded with their claims. An additional $28 billion has been claimed from investors in all three NAFTA nations. Seven cases against the United States are currently in active arbitration.

CAFTA actually poses an even greater threat than NAFTA because it includes not only the movement of goods across nations, but also the trade of services-mail delivery, etc. Services make up 70 to 80% of the US economy. Under CAFTA, governments are prevented from placing regulations that are deemed more burdensome than necessary to business. Regulations regarding where services can be provided, such as laws restricting urban growth, development in sensitive ecological areas, or toxic waste disposal, would be subject to challenge under this language.

Privatization of public services and deregulation are a central component of CAFTA. Already, multinational corporations are lobbying to gain access to postal, health care, educational and utility services in an effort to expand their businesses. State laws and municipal policies are frequently attacked as 'barriers to trade' or 'state monopolies'. The current campaign to privatize social security is part of this trend. Profit, instead of quality, is the goal in this ideological framework. Deregulation and privatization would seriously compromise and in some cases abolish, the enforcement of laws intended to protect our basic human rights such as health care, water, and education. These services should not be included in any trade agreement.

In Portland a coalition of labor, environmental, student and community groups has formed to work against the passage of CAFTA. Since President Bush is not likely to submit CAFTA to the Congress for ratification until he thinks it will pass, we are working to make sure he can’t count on any votes from Oregon. Currently, most of Oregon's congressional delegation remain undecided on the agreement. To date, Oregon Reps. Peter DeFazio, Darlene Hooley and David Wu have come out in opposition to Senators Ron Wyden and Gordon Smith remain noncommittal. We urge them to step up and do the right thing, by opposing the agreement. We must keep putting pressure on them until they do.

To contact your representative go to: http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/No OnCafta *Representative Earl Blumenauer (if you live in OR, and in district 3) *Representative Greg Walden (if you live in OR, and in district 2) *Senator Gordon Smith (if you live in OR) *Senator Ron Wyden (if you live in OR) To get involved locally in the fight against CAFTA, contact CBLOC\PCASC at 503236-7916. Rep. Blumenauer and Sen. Smith have announced plans to co-host a forum on trade and its effects on Oregon's economy, with panels of experts from business, labor, environmental and governmental organizations on Monday, May 2, from 9 AM to Noon at the University of Portland at The Buckley Center. Show up at 8:30 outside the event to hear speakers addressing CAFTA specifically.


From Firebrand No 3

Firebrand is a newspaper for rank and file workers in Portland. It's aims are building the power of rank and file workers and fighting the bureaucrats, bosses, and politicians who are our enemies.

To view the paper online, go to www.nafederation.org or download the PDF version from http://www.nafederation.org/issuethree.pdf

To submit an article for the next issue of the Firebrand, send an email to Firebrand@nafederation.org

Firebrand is a publication of the Firebrand Collective, a member collective of the Northwest Anarchist Federation.

author by Andrew - WSM (personal cap)publication date Tue May 10, 2005 22:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I understand that Firebrand is intended to be a Rank and file paper rather than an ideologically anarchist one but I'm curious about the 'we must hold our elected Oregon representatives accountable and urge them to vote 'no' on CAFTA' formulation in this article. Is this actually a viable strategy in Oregon - in Europe politicans would vote the way the party whip tells them to on issues like this - is it really that different in the USA?

author by Jered - Firebrand/NAFpublication date Wed Jun 29, 2005 09:04author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The reality of CAFTA in the U.S. is that it is in the hands of the government. Protests have never stopped free trade agreements in the U.S. This tactic has proven to work, senator bluemenhower pleadged to vote against cafta. Before this campaign, he was undecided.
I agree that this seems like a bad way for anarchists to organize, but you cant just focus on the short terms strategy of presuring politicians. You also have to look at how bringing up this issue in a palatable way to unionists involves them more in anti-free trade. For example, in my local, carpenters 247, we passed a resolution to never support a politician who supported CAFTA. Now, tell me thats not moving in the right direction, when union members become knowlegeable enough on the issue and impasioned enough that they recognize the need to stop free trade, even if it means not supporting politicians who supposidly return their support with favors. I think this is an instance where workers have taken a stand in solidarity with workers in central american and with our own collective self-interest, and have put workers needs first, which doesnt always happen in the labor movement.
Also, i dont think this peice was intended to be a strickly anarchist anylisis of cafta. This peice was mostly about pluging people into a campaigne.
Frankly, do you have any better ideas on how to stop CAFTA besides stopping it in the only place it can be stopped at this point (there's no way a mass movement will come about to stop it at this point, as has happend in latin american countries)...and cafta really does need to be stopped, and we have been somewhat sucseful to this point using this tactic (not that this tactic was chosen by firebrand, it was chosen mostly by the Cross Border Labor Organizing Committee and the Oregon AFL-CIO).

Firebrand picks it's battles carefully with the organized labor movement. This isnt one that made sense to battle over in terms of tactics.

Sorry for the late response to the question.

Jered
Firebrand/NAF
personal capacity

 
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
© 2005-2024 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]