user preferences

New Events

Elsewhere

no event posted in the last week

Thinking about anarchism: State authority

category elsewhere | miscellaneous | opinion / analysis author Saturday April 29, 2006 14:29author by Gregor - WSM - Workers Solidarity Report this post to the editors

Anarchism looks to get rid of the division between rulers and ruled, to establish a new social order in which the State will have no role and no power because we will live in a society of equals where each of us takes responsibility for our own actions.

Mary Harney has banned the sale of magic mushrooms!! In a decision taken in record-quick time, Harney and her government colleagues decided that they couldn’t have us all going around sampling mind-altering fungi and maybe even enjoying them. More importantly the decision was made that we couldn’t be trusted to decide for ourselves what was safe/unsafe for each of us to try. We need such decisions to be made for us because apparently we are incapable of deciding for ourselves.

And those that rule us would have it no other way. After all if they didn’t manage to sell us the idea that we need their laws to keep us safe, their role as rulers would effectively be gone. Over 150 years ago, the French anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon wrote “To be governed is to be kept in sight, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, estimated, valued, censured, commanded…To be governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction, noted, registered, enrolled, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorised, admonished, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished…” 1

‘Someone else’

What is quite amazing is the extent to which we have all submitted to this idea of needing ‘someone else’ to make decisions for us. If anyone has listened to recent media discussions about the increase in deaths on our roads, for example, it is impossible not to be struck by the fact that it seems the only solutions that either politicians or supposed experts can come up with are more gardai, increased penalty points etc. How about a truly radical idea?? People taking responsibility for their own actions - I won’t drive my car after a couple of pints, I won’t drive over the speed limits because I might kill someone else or myself.

Instead of this the constant refrain is – we need more cops, we need stronger laws. Yet, if any of these commentators were asked directly, they would of course claim that they themselves are perfectly responsible. But there’s always ‘someone else’ who needs to be controlled.

It’s not surprising really that this is the case. After all from the time we are knee-high we are indoctrinated with the idea of the need for regulation and rules. We are led to believe that that amorphous body referred to as ‘the State’ is necessary for both our protection and our social development. But perhaps we should look at things from a different perspective – have you ever considered the fact that far from creating social order, the State is in fact one of the principal causes of social disorder and disharmony?

Contradiction

The State as we know it is based on a fundamental contradiction. On the one hand it is supposedly democratic, it appears to welcome and encourage popular participation. After all we get a chance at election time to have our say in how the state is run, we get to decide in favour of or against a particular set of policies which will be implemented over the coming period. Ironically, however, it is through this very process of giving us ‘our say’ that we actually sign away our right to have any real influence over what happens. What happens is that we abrogate our ability to directly participate in decision-making and we buy into the notion that ‘someone else’ – the State, our rulers … - knows best. And once we buy into this decision we abdicate the idea of taking responsibility for our own actions. Thus the reason why people don’t drink and drive is the fear of getting caught rather than an awareness of the dangers involved. We apparently need a version of ‘Big Brother’ to keep us in check!!

Politicians always sell us the idea of course that they operate in the ‘national interest’ and in the ‘common good’. But the fact is that governments always – no matter what their political make-up – protect the status quo. There is no ‘national interest’. The State is there to protect the interests of those with money, power and privilege.

New Social Order

But of course it doesn’t have to be so. Anarchism looks to get rid of the division between rulers and ruled, to establish a new social order in which the State will have no role and no power because we will live in a society of equals where each of us takes responsibility for our own actions. In the words of Russian anarchist Peter Kropotkin

“Either the State for ever, crushing individual and local life, taking over in all fields of human activity, bringing with it its wars and its domestic struggles for power, its palace revolutions which only replace one tyrant by another, and inevitably at the end of this development there is …death!

Or the destruction of States, and new life starting again in thousands of centres on the principle of the lively initiative of the individual and groups and that of free agreement.

The choice lies with you!”2

1. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: General Idea of the Revolution, p. 294
2. Quoted in Marshall, Peter ‘Demanding The Impossible: A History of Anarchism’ P. 623


From Workers Solidarity 91, March/April 2006
PDF file online at http://www.struggle.ws/pdfs/ws/

author by Terencepublication date Tue May 23, 2006 22:16author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I think it needs to be more widely discussed and mentioned that the state compulsory schooling system which masquardes as education is actually one of the main pillars of the capitalist system.

This is a message we need to get out more. The state compulsory schooling system teaches us to obey, obey arbitary rules, to get used to a regimented system. It gets us to learn geography for 1 hour here, then English for this hour then Maths for another. Much of the learning is done in the abstract. Not only that we are segrated into groups of roughly the same age, when in real life, we encounter all ages. It largely denies that during our long evolution, learning would have been much more interactive and hands out. For example learning about glaciers and mountains from the blackboard has got to be a lot duller, than actually spending some time actually climbing the things and getting to know them physically.

Most importantly though school silently teaches us that learning is an one way street, where the information comes from the top down. When we leave school we unconscieniously, but very much so, switch that obedience or dependency to the state, institutes of authority and newspapers.

The net result is that we just take in stuff, but hardly ever reason, or discuss or argue about the material. This is the key to why the propaganda system of the state and corporate media through it's (one-way) broadcast systems of TV, radio and yes newspapers -is so amazingly effective and keeps the population both largely in check and ignorance.

The system is designed to suppress the natural intellect that everyone has if only it was allowed to develop. Instead the dependency mode keeps us mentally immature. Because we are hardly ever encouraged to question and discuss, then when it comes to the big picture of society we retain this same behaviour. Its no wonder then why one finds it so hard to get people to believe or even begin to listen to the various issues of so many of the things that are happening. What you are doing is fighting a lifelong indoctorination of a way of thinking or rather not thinking by people.

For those interested in some writings in this area checkout for example:

AGAINST SCHOOL
How public education cripples our kids, and why By John Taylor Gatto
at http://www.spinninglobe.net/againstschool.htm

More essays at URL below

Related Link: http://www.spinninglobe.net/gattopage.htm
author by nestorpublication date Fri May 19, 2006 01:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

...isn't it up to us to help people to learn that they CAN handle responsibility, when in it's in their interest and when no-one is going to batter them at the end?

author by Alanpublication date Thu May 18, 2006 23:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

There are way too many stupid people out there. Your ideas sound good in theory but never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers, like religion. The case of the magic mushrooms proves the stupidity of some people, one person did something stupid and ruined it all for the rest of us and so is likely if we were trusted to take responsibility for our own actions, there are alot of people who just can't handle that responsibility and the rest suffer because of it.

 
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
© 2005-2024 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]