Unraveling ideas: War is not as they paint it
venezuela / colombia |
imperialism / war |
Monday January 27, 2014 19:46 by Timoleón Jiménez - FARC-EP
State violence will always generate struggle, so it is an essential prerequisite to end it if we want to achieve peace. It's the only way to end the conflict.
The media disclose an overwhelming amount of information about the blows, which are permanently delivered by the Colombian military forces -led by U.S. advisers- against different guerrilla units, particularly the FARC, in development of the internal armed conflict.
President Santos is in charge of informing, with obvious personal satisfaction, the success of his troops. He always warns that the decreed offensive won't stop, but rather, that it will be intensified and extended. Hereby, he is completely dismissing any possibility of a bilateral cease-fire, which he considers highly inconvenient.
Thus, the government's intention to present a besieged and defeated guerrilla to the national and international opinion, is evident. A guerrilla, whose military and political incapacity will be charged at the Peace Talks, emphatically rejecting its aspirations and imposing the conditions of surrender, widely promoted from the very announcement of the talks. Humberto de la Calle recently reiterated the position of the national government; in part to silence Uribe and his entourage, and partly to alleviate the concerns of landowning, industry and financial sectors, as well as transnational investors, regarding the process of Havana.
The Colombian state imposes some uncivilized conditions on the confrontation, which are absolutely disproportionate compared to the capabilities of its adversary. This is visible to everyone, but it is cleverly presented as a normal development of a war against organizations that are capable of anything. The asymmetry of forces doesn't demonstrate the state's strength or legitimacy, but its huge political weakness and lack of moral arguments. The state presents an increasingly reduced number of demoralized guerrilla fighters to be defeated, which makes it strange that at the same time it is increasing troops and resources of all kinds in order to reduce them. Behind the devastating bombing, a harrowing despair is concealed.
The real war, not the one of the printed press and television, is not waged as they paint it. It should be clear that the defense ministry assumed the position of silencing and hiding the blows of the insurgency against its apparatus of death and terror. Helicopters, for example, are falling down because of accidents and coincidences, when it can't be concealed; they simply are never impacted by guerrilla fire. On 22 December, in the rural area Briceño, Antioquia, a helicopter was completely destroyed when it was preparing to land troops, in offensive operations against units of the Iván Ríos Block.
Although the defensive response occurred during the unilateral ceasefire, the army, fearing disclosure of its failure, didn't report it as a violation of the FARC-EP's pledged word, one of its usual resources of defamation. The same could be said of the device, which was demolished on the 9th of January by joint units of the FARC and the ELN in the rural municipality of Anorí. The military high command preferred to attribute it to any other cause, in order to prevent people from discovering its plan to land troops in remote areas. It becomes increasingly clear that the Army appeals to massive bombings due to its inability to hit the insurgency on the ground.
Evidence of this was the explosion of a mine on 24 December, which affected most of the commands, which were supposed to move secretly against FARC units in the same municipality. This forced the commander of the operation to give the order to collect all special commands troops, seeking to surprise the guerrilla units in Anorí, Briceño, Camping and Tarazá, by helicopters.
It isn't valid either, as President Santos claims, to consider that with air strikes - like the one made against FARC units in the rural area of Murindó on 15 December, where at three o'clock in the morning 24 bombs were dropped, killing a guerrilla fighter - the final blow to the FARC is delivered.
Not even in the case in which the final result has been more tragic, as in Puerto Rondón on 18 January, can it be said that the ships or assault troops have an easy job against a guerrilla movement which is about to surrender. In that midnight bombing, the guerrilla fighters of the Guadalupe Salcedo Unda Tenth Front fought with their rifles from the ground against the aircraft. They were able to hit three airplanes and part of their crew. It is known that a Bell helicopter made an emergency landing in Rondón, with eight shots in its fuselage, a captain with a stomach injury and a soldier with an affected arm. Another arrived at Arauca with two dead counter-insurgency soldiers. The battle, as can be seen, is about fighting, resisting and advancing.
Among the bodies, the military reported the body of Franklin, against whom they said they had performed the operation. His body could not be found because he survived unscathed. They also insisted, even several days later, that Edinson Romaña had perished in the bombardment against his unit in Meta. That day, January 4, a representative of the company Arroz PTC Huila, who, collaborating with the National Army, had arrived to negotiate the payment of law 002*. Obviously he was wearing a geopositioning device. Despite the 5 Kafir airplanes, which dropped cluster bombs, and the immediate troop landings by helicopters, fighting continued for four hours until eight in the evening.
During these events, there were three damaged helicopters, six soldiers killed and eight others were wounded, negative results which obviously were never disclosed. Moreover, considering that the confrontation is not purely military but essentially political, Santos' attack against the popular movement, with dozens of people killed, threatened and persecuted, has been denounced by many people in recent days. This shows that people are expressing their discontent and are getting organized for struggle. Much was said about the growth of the FARC in the 90s, but little about the unpunished state crimes against the UP and the social movement. Now they seem determined to repeat what happened then.
Hopefully the consequences won't be similar this time. State violence always generates struggle, so it is an essential prerequisite to end it if we want to achieve peace This is the only way to end the conflict. Everything else is useless.
Colombian jungle, January 23, 2014.
* The law 002 says that anyone who possesses more than a million dollars in assets should pay a revolutionary tax to the FARC-EP
FAG, 20 anos a enraizar anarquismo
Attentats de Paris: Contre leurs guerres, nos solidarités
Can’t Be Forgotten, Can’t Be Forgiven
Freedom for All? Members of Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Front threatened, activities disrupted, forced into hiding
Statement from Anarkismo on the AK Press accusations against Michael Schmidt
Proceso de paz, lucha de clases y las batallas del post-conflicto
Libertarian Communist Group: An Assessment And An Appeal
Ίδρυση Αναρχικής Πολιτικής Οργάνωσης
The deepening capitalist crisis: From blood and dirt to much worse
12e congrès d'Alternative Libertaire
Remember and Revive the Militant Tradition of September 3, 1984!
Building autonomy in Turkey and Kurdistan: an interview with Revolutionary Anarchist Action
Socialist Faces In High Places: Syriza’s Fall From Grace And The Elusive Electoral Road
Aportes para un análisis de la Etapa Histórica Actual
From Living Wage to Working Class Counter-power
On the Recent Massacre in Suruç, Turkish Kurdistan
Grèce: Quelles suites à la victoire du «non»?
The Meaning of World War II—An Anarchist View
Bakunin, Malatesta e o Debate da Plataforma
Setting Fire to the Noose
International call for solidarity with the case of Nicolás Neira
1º Congreso de la Federación Anarquista de Rosario (FAR)
María Esther Biscayard de Tello, nuestro homenaje
The party is haunting us again
Colombia… is peace in the air? Sep 06 0 comments
Once again talks of peace have been placed on the political agenda in Colombia, with the goodwill of a significant section of the establishment. This development in not a free gift nor does it come from the good will of the president: it is obvious that the thesis of “the end of the ending” lacked substance, and that the “Plan Colombia” has reached its limit. Although this agreement is a positive development, we cannot be excessively optimistic, even less so, triumphalist, considering that “peace”, in itself, would represent a triumph for the popular classes and their historic demands, blocked by fire and blood for more than half a century, by the State. We must bear in mind that the road towards an eventual negotiating process is full of difficulties, since there are substantial and basic differences between what the different parties expect from the negotiations and what the understand by the word “peace”. [Castellano]
The significance of the killing of Alfonso Cano Nov 07 0 comments
With the assassination of Cano, the Colombian government has closed the doors to dialogue. How will the insurgency react? It is difficult to predict, but whatever the exact form its response assumes, in all likelihood it will involve a period of deepening and intensification of conflict - standing idly by or reiterating calls for dialogue and peace that fall on deaf ears doesn't seem to be an option now for the FARC-EP. If the Colombian government demonstrates its willingness and intent to pursue the military option, then this is what will happen, and we know what it is that this route has to offer Colombia...
200 years of independence in Colombia? There is nothing to celebrate! Jul 21 0 comments
Today, 200 years after the cry of “independence”, we live under slavery and despotism well disguised in various masquerades in our lives. One of the main achievements of the “liberators” was indeed to expel the Spanish empire, what ended up being nothing more than a distraction, not only for the creation of a new local ruling elite, but also to allow other empires to step in against the interests of our own people: while in 1500 they talked about civilisation, on 2001 they came to talk about the “war on terror”.
No more coups in Latin America! Apr 22 Chile 0 comments
We can be sure that the young people of Latin America will be on the side of the Venezuelan people, because we will never accept a repitition of what happened in Honduras and Paraguay, because we will never accept death as a tool in the hands of the powerful for putting an end to the changes which the poor need. [Castellano]