user preferences

Occupy is Dead. Now What?

category north america / mexico | community struggles | opinion / analysis author Thursday December 27, 2012 10:39author by Colin O - Rochester Red & Black, Common Struggle - Libertarian Communist Federation Report this post to the editors

How do we move beyond movement moments, and start taking strategic advantage of the moment in such a way that strengthens our efforts decades down the road? Did we gain strength from involvement in the Occupy Wall Street movement, or not? Is the idea of Occupy Wall Street a short-sighted route to building mass revolutionary movements?

ows.jpeg

The Occupy Movement is a thing of the past. I think it’s safe to say that now. I don’t say this to be a downer on the movement or to destroy the momentum that we may have built. These moments of accelerated activity for the left are important, but they aren’t all that we are. And so, I don’t see the Occupy Movement coming to an end as a bad thing for us as radicals. But, we should recognize it so that we can begin to move onto new phases and next steps of our continual growth as a movement.

To do this, we need to look back briefly and reflect on Occupy and what it teaches us. My experiences were largely with Occupy Rochester, and most of my reflections will begin from there. But in my conversations with many people that participated in other Occupy’s, I don’t think that what I saw in Rochester was unrepresentative of many Occupations around the country.

As with any movement, we should start with what we’ve gained over the course of the moment. With Occupy, there seem to be a lot of fairly vague things gained. Economic inequality is now a national talking point. Moderate to liberal politicians and mainstream media have been forced to recognize economic inequality as part of the conversation, even if superficially and through the same flawed, capitalist lens that they have always seen through.

For some of the more militant elements of the left in the country, we also discovered that there is some validity to the idea that courageous and militant actions that step outside of the typical venues for social change are in fact capable of inspiring mass participation and self-organization.

But, in some of the more objective outlooks, it doesn’t seem to me as if we’ve gained much. It doesn’t seem as if any of the various Occupy groups have spawned sustainable organizations capable of continued resistance to the structures that cause the inequality that Occupy originally identified as much of the problem. So while we may have inspired ourselves, which should never be dismissed, it also doesn’t look like we’ve become much more widespread in our organization or in our collective power.

The trajectory toward revolutionary change is a long one, and we have moments that may be revolutionary or they may just be moments that we should strengthen ourselves – building new combative organizations and growing the membership of the ones we already had. From where I stand, it seems as though we missed that moment. And, what worries me, is that in my short time of involvement in these sort of movements, that seems to be a regular feature of the US left.

As the global justice movement in the US slowed, it didn’t seem like we had built a stronger left. The energy of this movement, however, did flow nicely into building a large anti-war mobilization movement. Unfortunately, that also didn’t seem to build new or strengthen many existing organizations and resistance movements.

To me, this is central. These movement moments require a great deal of resources. Time, energy, and money are required to build these huge mobilizations. In most movement moments it seems that a lot of activists simply burn out, having put in more energy than they really had. If our movements cost this much, we need to come out on the other side stronger and better suited for the next fight.

So, what is it that leads us to miss these moments? I’m sure there are dozens of answers, all of which are just as partially correct. The part that I’m hoping to contribute is that I think we often display a sort of notoriously short American attention span. We get excited about the exciting portions of movements, but don’t commit ourselves in a massive enough way to the more serious, harder part of building movements – targeted outreach, consciousness raising, analysis development and organization building.

Activists in US-based movements see mass protests in Egypt, student strikes in Quebec, workplace takeovers in Argentina and leap to saying that we have to do those sort of actions. They’re right, partially. In the US we absolutely need movements that can and will take those sort of actions to fight for fundamental changes in our social and economic reality. So we jump to organizing an occupation because that’s the goal and it looks exciting.

However, if we take a step back and look at the movements that inspire us, we’d quickly realize that they’re able to take these mass actions after years of work developing organizations and spreading consciousness. If they didn’t skip that work, we shouldn’t believe that we can. We live in a nation that has an incredible ability to dodge basic class consciousness, with little recent experience in mass militant protest, where people have very little sense of the actual power they could wield.

With a quick glance at some of the many international movements that inspire us, we can see that there is considerably more to them than the mass actions that we see

Egypt – “Ash-shaʻb yurīd isqāṭ an-niẓām (The people want to bring down the regime.)”

Just a few months before Occupy Wall Street broke out, the Arab Spring was inspiring a generation of activists throughout the world. While the demonstrations seemed to begin (can we ever really say begin?) in Tunisia, it’s the mass protests of Egypt that seemed to catch the world’s attention. On January 25th, 2011 mass protests appeared in Tahrir Square to protest growing poverty and the leadership of the three decade-rule of Hosni Mubarak. These protests are largely seen as spontaneous.

However, when we look to the youth that seem to have spontaneously called this protest, we find an organization called the April 6th Youth Movement. What is the significance of April 6th? On April 6th, 2008 a series of strikes led by textile workers in Mahalla led to a national general strike and the push for a labor movement independent of the state apparatus. The April 6th Youth Movement formed from this movement as an organizations of leftists, students and workers calling for drastic social change and recognizing the power of organized people to achieve that change. Much of the groups activity was tied to a facebook group that in 2009 had 70,000 members actively participating in debate and massively extending political, social, and economic consciousness of youth in the country.

Only five days after the initial protests in Egypt, Egyptian workers saw the necessity for mass organization to coordinate their participation and formed the Egyptian Federation of Independent Trade Unions (EFITU). On February 6th, EFITU called for a General Strike and began to shut down entire sectors of the economy. On February 11th, Hosni Mubarak was no longer in power in Egypt.

Quebec – “Why do you strike when you have the lowest tuition in Canada? We have the lowest tuition in Canada because we strike.”

More recently, many of us in the US left have been inspired by the huge student strikes that have swept Quebec. What has to be remembered by all of us is that this is a dramatic surge of energy and militancy from students that have a decades-long tradition of organization. Both students and anarchists have been well organized in Quebec for years.

The more militant arm of the Quebec student movement – Association pour une solidarité syndicale étudiante – was formed in 2001 and by the time of the strike in 2012 had 50,000 members in 25 university-level organizations. The other major student unions in Quebec have a combined membership of around 200,000. Members of these unions pay dues into an organization that is then able to hire staff, maintain offices, fund organizing efforts, etc. It’s in moments of mass-movement momentum that these organizations are able to form and then again it’s in those moments that these organizations are able to grow.

Anarchists and other revolutionaries have been actively involved in these organizations and the various movements around them for years. Some of these revolutionaries act simply as participants within the major student unions and some of them coordinate as members of groups like the anarchist Union Comuniste Libertaire. The existence of organizations like this help them to coordinate the efforts of revolutionaries and actively participate in the battle of ideas internal to the student movement.

Argentina – “Que se vayan todos (they all must go!)”

Further back in the early 2000′s many of us involved in various labor and community efforts were inspired to hear about the worker recuperated factories movement and the growing people’s assemblies in Argentina following their massive economic collapse.

As the economy collapsed, many workers took over their factories and workplaces rather than allow them to close and layoff all workers. In many cases, these workplaces began to operate again under worker control. A federation of worker-controlled workplaces grew and began to organize and advocate for further expropriations. In Buenos Aires, directly democratic neighborhood assemblies appeared to organize around the immediate needs of their territory as the government went through many rapid changes. Through workplace and community organizing, movements in Argentina began to create the institutions capable of sustainably maintaining grassroots, rank-and-file power.

In many ways, these were some of the most spontaneous formations. Even here, we find a long history of mass-movement building. Most workers in Argentina already belonged to unions. Thousands of people were active in socialist parties and anarchist organizations. These organizations had participants that were active in unions and community groups before the economic collapse. So, to say that the ideas raised in the intense moments of the 2001 economic collapse and following uprising were totally spontaneous would be faulty. However, this uprising became the birthplace of totally new organizations that took on very new forms from the ones before them.

Even in the case of a much more spontaneous collapse and uprising, the movement forces in Argentina seemed better poised to strengthen their efforts after the movement moment. They didn’t simply wear out activists. They built new organizations, many of which have lasted for years and engaged thousands of new people and substantially built the organized power of working class movements.

Back in the U.S.A.

There is no short-cut for organizing! If we’re ever going to genuinely change society for the better, we’re going to need to build massive organizations in workplaces, communities, and schools. We absolutely should be aiming for the day when we can organize general strikes, student strikes, university occupations, and all of these exciting tactics that keep many of us so inspired by the power of everyday people to take control of the world around them. But, we also have to be real with ourselves. We need these tactics to win rather than get crushed. We need to have them build our movements rather than drain them. We need to come out stronger on the other end of the intensification of struggle.

If that’s going to happen, we need to get comfortable with the real work necessary to build organizations. We need to build a tolerance for the less-than-sexy work of decision making processes. We need to spend more time spreading our ideas and messages to people that aren’t already activists or lefties.

In short, we need to dedicate ourselves to being life-long movement builders and organizers rather than momentarily excitable activists.

Related Link: http://redandblack.rocus.org/?p=160
author by Oscar the Grouchpublication date Fri Dec 28, 2012 00:41Report this post to the editors

Occupy is dead? Haha. No. It isn't.

author by coventry - ex-occupy portlandpublication date Sat Dec 29, 2012 07:00Report this post to the editors

Thanks for this article. I have a perception that the more self-consciously radical/revolutionary elements of Occupy, at least in Portland, were not prepared to engage in organizing in a populist context, yet the broader movement was in fact populist and not clearly anti-capitalist. In Portland this seemed to lead to disappointment and then separation in order to carry out more clearly anti-capitalist actions. That may have been a legitimate or even a good choice. But it was not linked to forward looking organizing that would have maintained relationships with less radical forces and maybe radicalized them.

Is this common in other parts of the country? The description of movements in other countries suggests a similar structure but a different attitude to the less radical people in the movement. Possibly also a different attitude toward demands upon the state that were short of "end capitalism"?

author by Joost van Steenispublication date Sat Dec 29, 2012 15:38author email downwithelite at gmail dot comauthor address Amsterdam, The NetherlandsReport this post to the editors

The whole article concentrates on the necessity of mass actions and organising for mass actions and neglects other possibilities. It does not question the results of the mass actions.
What were the results of these mass actions? Some change indeed but not a fundamental change. Even in Egypt the same kind of persons (the 1%) are still on top though they have ousted some of the leaders as Mubarak, also because these Mubaraks appropriated too much (also at the cost of the wealth of other parts of the 1%).
The actions did not fulfil a basic rule in actions, damage to the 99% must be minimised and pressure on the 1% maximised. Too many 99% were hurt, imprisoned and killed while the 1% could continue to live in their privileged and extravagant world. Actions took nearly always place in the centres of the towns and the places where the 1% lived remained untouched.
Occupy failed because it did abandon the initial slogan that made people enthusiast - Occupy the financial centres and got lost in partial political demands. To get real change direct actions against the 1% are necessary and mass actions are not sufficient for that.
Pressure on the 1% can be maximised by intruding in their private exclusive world. Damage to the 99% can be minimised by initiating actions of small groups (I call them Autonomous Clubs) that avoid clashes with the police and directly attack the 1%. Or as Jean-Paul Marat once said : “Revolution will be a kind of guerilla in which we can attack the enemy in all places where the army cannot be used. This means that we can deprive the enemy of all his advantages”. I have written on my blog about the how of a Fourth People's Power. And for the means I refer to an article about Autonomous Clubs : http://downwithelite.wordpress.com/autonomous-clubs/

author by Xplopublication date Sun Dec 30, 2012 09:58Report this post to the editors

Well of course Occupy is dead.

For all that Occupy pats itself on the back and pretends that it accomplished great things, it actually accomplished very little. Criminal bankers are still walking free while our corrupt government refuses to prosecute them and wealth inequality is still as bad as it was two years ago. Foreclosures are still happening, jobs are still scarce, the homeless are still homeless, we're still at war, and politicians are still threatening us with austerity.

Occupy needed one of two things to continue. One was a set of concrete demands, goals, or model legislation that the American people could focus on. Countless words have been written about how making specific demands would have been a mistake (for reasons ranging from wedge issues to co-optation to not legitimizing the supremacy of the ruling class by, y'know, asking them for things), but it's obvious in hindsight that with nothing concrete to support, supporters increasingly saw Occupy as a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing.

The other was a continued show of strength. Occupy suffered a critical blow when the coordinated police attacks shut down the camps and Occupiers scattered instead of reoccupying in force - but they could have continued to force their issues (and their ideology) into the public consciousness with regular marches or rallies that showed that they still cared enough to get in the street. When even the actions stopped, supporters largely lost interest; the inspiration and energy was gone.

The handful of remaining Occupiers offer their continued association as proof that Occupy's not dead, but they're only fooling themselves.

author by Karenpublication date Fri Jan 04, 2013 15:55Report this post to the editors

It's true that Occupy is over partly because of a lack of clear ideas and organization, and anarchists can provide these. The thing is, in my city, a lot of us tried. But we're vastly outnumbered by liberals. And even more outnumbered by the millions of people who honestly don't care and are completely apathetic about politics. A lot of Occupiers, let's face it, were in this category before fall 2011, and now they're back there again - back to their normal, middle class lives, struggling economically but basically keeping their heads down. The anarchists I know do a lot of day-to-day work - but we're surrounded by a vast population that's basically conservative.

If the author is suggesting that we need to have thousands of people in formal organizations before occupying university buildings or organizing strikes, I disagree. That is a formula for never having occupations and strikes, which are obviously their own form of propaganda, and do much to inspire people to become more active and critical, much more than some website or newspaper. Occupy had a million flaws, but I'm sure more people were radicalized by talking to anarchists late into the night at camp than by some boring meeting or flier.

 
This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch
Issue #3 of the Newsletter of the Tokologo African Anarchist Collective

North America / Mexico | Community struggles | en

Wed 01 Oct, 06:03

browse text browse image

textIn a time of hardship, Miami-Dade County Ramps up Foreclosures 09:40 Thu 20 Dec by S Nappalos 0 comments

In a time when people are experiencing unparalleled hardship, Miami-Dade county is ramping up to steamroll more foreclosures. This news comes as rents are rising[1] in Miami spurred on by international speculators and investors, and people losing their homes. Nationally homeless is increasing due to the pervasive unemployment, sub-poverty wages of the lowest tier of the working population, and the multi-decade long attacks on housing safety nets. We are now witnessing a homelessness that includes young able bodied people some of whom are working while homeless[2].

the_real_obama_spread_it_out_by_latuff2.jpg imageUnchanged: Progressive Disillusionment in the Age of Obama 12:44 Sat 24 Nov by Zakk Flash 0 comments

Now that President Obama is “safely” ensconced in the White House for another four years and “disaster Supreme Court decisions” are averted, liberal and progressive voters need to join radical activists in the fight against endless war, ecological destruction, and austerity. Obama no longer has an incentive to make any pretense of throwing a single crumb to liberals – resignation and acquiescence on “pragmatic grounds” will allow bargains that are hostile to the interests of the working class.

text"Riot" at Greenbridge: Three Arrested at Anti-Gentrification Occupation in Chapel Hill, NC 14:38 Mon 20 Jun by Jericho 0 comments

On Saturday, June 18th, dozens of anarchists and other community members staged an angry protest against gentrification and green capitalism at Greenbridge, a “green” development of condos for eco-yuppies. Demonstrators held banners outside while others occupied the lobby in an expression of outrage against the displacement of renters from the neighborhood. Three people were arrested and charged with felony “inciting a riot” and misdemeanor property destruction, and have been released on bail. The demonstration drew attention to the ongoing tolls inflicted by the development, which was built by a coalition of multi-millionaires over the protests of community members to profit off the bourgeois craze with all things “green.” But money is the only thing green about Greedbridge, as it has been nicknamed by neighbors.

wisconsin_8.jpg imageWSA statement of solidarity with Wisconsin Workers 18:18 Tue 01 Mar by Workers Solidarity Alliance 0 comments

WSA extends solidarity and our most sincere wishes for victory to the workers of Wisconsin in their current fight. And to all public sector workers now struggling against attacks on their pensions and their rights.

sante.jpg image[Quebec] Health Care Action In Saguenay 10:57 Mon 08 Nov by Voix de faits 0 comments

Yesterday, November 6, the Collectif Emma Goldman of the Québec UCL, along with the student employee's union of the University of Québec in Chicoutimi organized a demonstration against the privatization of health care and fees for service. The following is translated from the original French at the Québec City Voix De Faits Blog. More details and photo reportage are available at the Collectif Emma Goldman site.

[Français]

(translation taken from Molly's blog: http://mollymew.blogspot.com/)

textMilitary Surveillance of Anarchists in Washington State 11:40 Thu 06 Aug by Brendan Maslauskas Dunn 2 comments

A request for the public records the city of Olympia, Washington keeps on anarchists, Wobblies, and members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) has forced into the open a military infiltrator who posed as an anarchist for two years, in clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

2008.us.tour.a3.jpg imageAnarchists Against The Wall, North American speaking tour 16:47 Wed 21 Jan by Anarchists Against The Wall 0 comments

Schachaf Polakow, a member of Anarchists Against the Wall, will be touring the U.S. and Canada from February 1st to March 9th. His presentation will include film and photos, and will focus both on AATW's recent work in solidarity with Gaza and our ongoing work in the West Bank.

09401_309_408b.gif imageWhose Streets? 03:25 Fri 10 Oct by Andrew Hedden and Jacquelyn Hermer 0 comments

Seattle today is a tale of two cities. For developers, government officials, and many new residents, Seattle is about its places of plenty: shopping opportunities, property values, beautiful views, and potential profits. Look beyond the skyscrapers and a different image of Seattle emerges: that of a blue-collar port city with an immigrant soul--a place of strength, survival, and struggle against racism and poverty. When these two Seattles collide, it's called gentrification: the displacement of poor and working class people by upper-income residents. It's a conflict over values, over purpose: who is claiming the city?

If we plant these today, what will we harvest tomorrow? imageProtests in Juchitan against wind companies 05:44 Thu 04 Sep by Assembly in Defense of Land and Territory 0 comments

For more than seven months, we, communal land owners from Juchitan de Zaragoza, Union Hidalgo and Xadani, have dealt with the irresponsibility of the civil judge of Juchitan de Zaragoza, Oaxaca, in front of whom we've placed more than 120 claims for the nullification of contracts we were deceived into signing with transnational wind energy corporations.

textAnother Successful Eviction Blockade for Boston's Working Class Housing Movement! 03:54 Fri 18 Jul by Thomas Giovanni 0 comments

On the July 15th eviction blockade led by Paula Taylor and the City Life/ Vida Urbana Bank Tenants Union

more >>

imageWhat's in a Name: Grounding Housing Justice in Class Struggle Nov 22 by S.B. 0 comments

When considering creating an "Eviction Free Zone," you have to remember that it is only a rhetorical tool in the advance of a class-based agenda. [Italiano]

imageProcedural Justice: How We Can Find Our Foundations in the Worst Case Scenario Jan 20 by SB 0 comments

In the housing defense movement, we often get bogged down in legal approaches and the banking fraud we use as leverage. But what about situations when it is merely a lack of funds for the person living in the home? It is at those moments that you see the most crucial element of the struggle, and how you can use this organizing to transform the conversation about housing.

imageFrom the Square to the Block to the Shop: Spread The Occupation Amid the Whirlwind of Crisis Oct 12 by Miami Autonomy & Solidarity 0 comments

A movement is born. Across America and around the world occupations have spread. We witness the beauty and struggle of a new protagonist joining the fight against oppression and exploitation.

Crisis feeds conflict: the pillaging of communities galvanizes people from Greece and Chile, Bangladesh and China, the United States and Spain. A massive wave has been unleashed of impoverishment, unemployment, austerity, and stealing of resources by capital, governments, and the wealthy. We face loss of our jobs, homes, and way of living, with no avenue for contesting these problems within the institutions of power. Doors are being closed. Futures are being stolen.

The newly impoverished, students whose hopes have been dashed by a life debt and joblessness, veterans returned from hellish war to be discarded, workers facing speed-ups and cuts across the board, families displaced and attacked by anti-immigrant reaction, the sick without access, people forced out of their homes: we are the indignants. While economic restructuring creates new opportunities to pile wealth upon wealth and heap poverty on poverty, new protagonists come forth. The working class recomposes: they force changes on our lives, and we respond with new struggles, new demands, and new relationships – a new social protagonism. [Français]

imageFilm Screening: The Chicago Conspiracy Apr 25 by Subversive Action Films 0 comments

A documentary based in Chile that explores the legacy of the Pinochet dictatorship, the current political conflict and the response by radical social movements.

imageNeighborhood Associations – A Personal Experience Dec 19 by Larry Gambone 7 comments

The neighborhood association is an important area for anarchist involvement. Of the popular organizations, such as trade unions or cooperatives, these associations are the easiest ones to implant oneself in. The reason is the lack of bureaucracy or controlling bureaucratic caste with which one must struggle in the other institutions. The neighborhood association is a natural place of involvement for militants who are retired, students, self-employed, or on social assistance. [Italiano]

more >>

imageWSA statement of solidarity with Wisconsin Workers Mar 01 WSA 0 comments

WSA extends solidarity and our most sincere wishes for victory to the workers of Wisconsin in their current fight. And to all public sector workers now struggling against attacks on their pensions and their rights.

imageAnarchists Against The Wall, North American speaking tour Jan 21 AATW 0 comments

Schachaf Polakow, a member of Anarchists Against the Wall, will be touring the U.S. and Canada from February 1st to March 9th. His presentation will include film and photos, and will focus both on AATW's recent work in solidarity with Gaza and our ongoing work in the West Bank.

text200 Soldiers Invade Zapatista Land Jun 10 0 comments

"Comrades of the Other Campaign in Mexico and other countries, we ask you to be on the alert because the soldiers said they’ll be back in two weeks. We don’t want war. We want peace with justice and dignity. But we have no other choice than to defend ourselves, resist them, and eject them when they come looking for a confrontation with us in the towns of the Zapatista support bases...All we can tell you is to look and see
where the provocation is coming from. We’re now informing you of what’s going on, hopefully in time."

textStatement on the Murder of Brad Will and the Situation in Oaxaca Nov 01 NEFAC, NYMAA 0 comments

A statement by the New York Metro Alliance of Anarchists, endorsed by the anglophone secretariat of NEFAC, on the murder of Brad Will and others, and the situation in Oaxaca.

textBoston Actions in Solidarity with the People of Oaxaca! Oct 03 Boston Anarchists for Popular Assemblies 0 comments

On Saturday, September 30th, as Mexican military helicopters flew over Oaxaca City with the intent of threatening and intimidating the peaceful movement of the Popular Assemblies of the People of Oaxaca, Boston activists gathered at the Boylston T stop to spread awareness about the imminent invasion of Oaxaca City by the federal Mexican Army. This small educational action marked the beginning of an on-going campaign of Boston solidarity with the movement of the popular assemblies in Oaxaca. Read more for ideas on how to get involved!

more >>
© 2005-2014 Anarkismo.net. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Anarkismo.net. [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]