user preferences

Grassroots Union: Prohibited!

category netherlands / germany / austria | workplace struggles | appeal / petition author Thursday December 17, 2009 17:40author by FAU-IAA - Freien ArbeiterInnen-Union Report this post to the editors

Urgent call for international solidarity

On December 11, 2009, the Berlin District Court decided that the Free Workers' Union Berlin (FAU-B) could no longer call itself a union or grassroots union. This is the culmination of a series of attempts by the Neue Babylon Berlin GmbH to legally hogtie the strongest and most active form of workers' representation in the company.

FAU Berlin Banned As Union

Urgent call for international solidarity

On December 11, 2009, FAU Berlin (FAU-B) was essentially banned as a union. The decision was made by the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin) without a hearing. FAU-B was not even informed that the Neue Babylon GmbH – which is involved in a labor dispute with FAU-B – had started legal proceedings against them. The court’s decision goes beyond merely taking away FAU-B’s rights as a union within the Babylon cinema. From this point on they are no longer allowed to call themselves a union!


FAU-B and its group within the Babylon cinema have been fighting for a labor contract since the beginning of June 2009. Although the Babylon cinema is government funded, pay has been miserable and workers rights have been ignored. A large portion of the cinema’s staff is organized within FAU-B. This is the first significant labor dispute of the relatively small FAU-B. It has caused an uproar not only in Berlin, but in all of Germany. Anarcho-syndicalists in a labor dispute, an effective boycott that was prominent in the media, extensive and innovative demands, and the involvement of the workers themselves (which is rare in Germany) have made an impression on the public. When the pressure was at its height and the bosses could no longer avoid entering negotiations, not only did politicians intervene but ver.di (a big union in Germany, part of the umbrella organization of mainstream unions, DGB) took up negotiations with the bosses even though they had almost no members among the cinema’s staff and no mandate from them. The workers, who were obviously flabbergasted, were excluded from negotiations.

Apparently a deal was made between ver.di, politicians, and bosses to get rid of FAU-B and calm things down at the cinema. But the staff and FAU refused to be silenced. Neue Babylon GmBH reacted by flexing some legal muscle and ver.di by attempting to damage FAU’s image. Firstly, the boycott – one of FAU-B’s main forms of pressure – was banned, and doubt was cast on FAU-B’s ability to negotiate contracts (in Germany this is a prerequisite for being able to legally take collective action). At the same time, other court cases were brought against FAU-B relating to freedom of expression. But FAU-B did not back down. This led to the latest court decision, which basically bans FAU as a union.

The situation in Germany

FAU Berlin has long said that this labor dispute – as small as it may be – is not only about better working conditions but also about the freedom to organize. There has been little tradition of militant unionism or syndicalism in Germany since 1933. The umbrella organization DGB has a practical monopoly (corporatism), which is backed up by case law. This makes it very hard for alternative unions to grow. Self-organization and decentralization within unions in Germany are not encouraged and do not enjoy legal protection.

FAU-B’s modest collective action has demonstrated that an alternative union is possible in Germany. Big unions and politicians, apparently afraid that this form of organization will spread like wildfire, are displeased by this development. This is the context in which FAU-B’s union work has been banned. The court’s decision implies that it is not possible to establish a legally recognized union in Germany because – paradoxically –you have to be a legally recognized union in order to become one. A union taking collective action without being an officially recognized union can expect stiff legal consequences. On two occasions FAU-B has been threatened with fines of 250,000 euros or jail sentences. FAU-B is not allowed to work legally as a union anywhere. German anarcho-syndicalists thus see themselves banned once again after being prohibited in 1914 and 1933.

The court’s decision is especially scandalous because it was rubber-stamped via summary proceedings without any hearing – FAU-B was not allowed to state its case. This is possibly to do with the fact that anyone in Germany can legally call themselves a union and that the judicial authorities wanted to act unilaterally. Germany has passed some ILO conventions, but they have little meaning here because big unions cooperate closely with the bosses and dictate what a union has to be like. Syndicalists enjoyed more rights under the Kaiser in the 19th century and in the 1920s. The situation in Germany is reminiscent of Turkey, for example, where unions are often banned.

The court’s decision can possibly be overturned. But FAU-B remains realistic: everything is possible. Political cronyism is rife and the powers that be will make further attempts to block the growth of alternative unions.


The consequences of the court’s decision are wide-ranging and will be catastrophic unless the decision is overturned. An outright ban of FAU-B as a union would have had a similar effect. The decision regarding FAU-B is essentially applicable to FAU in Germany as a whole. As it sets precedence, it will automatically affect the entire union movement and the rights of workers. Whatever form an alternative union in Germany might have, this precedent will render it powerless in future. This case is a novelty in the sphere of German union-busting. This decision allows the bosses to negotiate with the union of their choice and to define what a union is. Workers’ self-organization – whether in the Babylon cinema or elsewhere – has been blocked, and the institutionalized muzzling of the working class has been intensified. The lack of solidarity shown by ver.di through their intervention is partly to blame for this. The court decision may even be in their direct interest since ver.di has already written that they see FAU-B as competition that they have to take action against.


The battle for union freedom in Germany has now begun. Every little bit of solidarity is needed. Bring this scandal to light, protest in front of German institutions, and demand that the decision be overturned and that FAU be given full rights as a union!

Please help us if you can. Your own ideas are welcome, but here are some suggestions:

  • protest in front of German diplomatic missions (embassies, consulates) or other institutions representing the German state;
  • send protest letters to German embassies in your country (and a copy to the management of the Babylon Mitte cinema);
  • send protest faxes to the Berlin court responsible.
Here you find a list of all German diplomatic missions. Look if there is an embassy or consulate in your city. This file also includes information on how to contact the embassy in your country. The listed country names are given in German. Here you find – if necessary – a table to find out how your country’s name is in German.

The contact to the Management of the cinema Babylon Mitte is:
Fax: +49 – (0)30 – 24727-800
E-mail: |

The contact to the competent court (Landgericht Berlin) is:
Fax: +49 (0)30 90188 – 518

You will find the relevant information at as soon as we can put it online. It includes a list of German diplomatic mission, pointers to other relevant institutions, templates for protest letters, and the necessary contact data.

The first protests took place on Saturday, December 19, 2009. We would appreciate it if you could act really soon. But your solidarity is not restricted to that date – it can be expressed at any time.

An important aspect: It is possible that the court’s decision be overturned by legal means. But we cannot rely on this. The simple fact that a ban against our union was pronounced so easily (even if we have right of appeal) demands a clear response. All the more so because this case is symptomatic of our rights as workers in Germany.

Contact for FAU Berlin: Lars Röhm | | +49 1577-8491072.
Please don’t forget to send information about your protests to the Berlin comrades (!

Related Link:
author by W.S.A.publication date Tue Dec 22, 2009 22:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Dear Friends & comrades,

We hope this quick email finds all well. Please excuse the rather impersonal and mechanical nature of this email.

Many of you may already be awate of the big fight the Berlin Local of the Free Workers Union (FAU-IWA) is now engaged. What started as a single workplace struggle has turned into one of national
importance for all German workers who struggle for independent, membership controlled unionism.
Fpr those of you whi are not aware of this struggle, background information can be found on the FAU website

If members of your organization can be encouraged to send protest emails (see below) that would be great. If your organization can send one as well, that would also be important. We are encoraging as many emails as possible. There is a lot at issue here that goes beyond the struggle of one small group of workers against a boss. To a large measure, the future of indpendent working class self-organization is one the line in Germany.

The Polish Syndicalists of the ZSP have set up an email protest thingy which will make it easier for those who haven't already sent a protest:

The W.S.A. and its previous groups has had a more than 30 year relationship with the FAU and they have always been decent, honest and non-sectarian comrades and would always stand in solidarity with others. It's our turn to stand in solidarity with them. Any and all help would be most appreicated.

Thanks in advance.

Yours in solidarity,
WSA Corresponding Secretary

Workers Solidarity Alliance (W.S.A.)
Offices: 339 Lafayette Street - Room 202
New York, New York 10012 usa

author by Waterside - Liberty and Solidaritypublication date Sun Jan 03, 2010 02:55author email walkingbeard at gmail dot comauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors


Please can we have a background to and copy of the court ruling? We must know why the court has banned you from being a union.

Thank you.

author by Michael Schmidt - ZACF (South Africa)publication date Mon Jan 04, 2010 04:07author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The situation is a really difficult one for the FAU Berlin. If they abide by the ruling they effectively step outside the legally protected ring of union organising and are fair game for the bosses and the authorities who will dearly love to break them organizationally and financially - besides perhaps making themselves irrelevant to workers who might otherwise want to join them.

If they fight the ruling, it will no doubt prove lengthy and expensive - maybe even as expensive as the fines they'd incur for defying the ruling. It would seem to me that what is really needed is a legal strategy: find a solid, reputable leftie lawyer (if the likes of a Henri Torres of the 2000s exists!) willing to take up the cudgels pro deo, and to make a public stink about this, a concerted campaign in defence of the right of all German workers to organise - because that is the real issue here, not the suppression of a marginal union, but the sharpening of the axe against all worker organisation.

One can only think of Pastor Martin Niemoller's famous self-excorciation: "First they came for the trade unionists, but I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist..."

Red & Black regards

This page can be viewed in
English Italiano Deutsch

Front page

Reflexiones sobre la situación de Afganistán

Αυτοοργάνωση ή Χάος

South Africa: Historic rupture or warring brothers again?

Declaración Anarquista Internacional: A 85 Años De La Revolución Española. Sus Enseñanzas Y Su Legado.

Death or Renewal: Is the Climate Crisis the Final Crisis?

Gleichheit und Freiheit stehen nicht zur Debatte!

Contre la guerre au Kurdistan irakien, contre la traîtrise du PDK

Meurtre de Clément Méric : l’enjeu politique du procès en appel

Comunicado sobre el Paro Nacional y las Jornadas de Protesta en Colombia

The Broken Promises of Vietnam

Premier Mai : Un coup porté contre l’un·e d’entre nous est un coup porté contre nous tou·tes

Federasyon’a Çağırıyoruz!

Piştgirîye Daxuyanîya Çapemenî ji bo Êrîşek Hatîye li ser Xanîyê Mezopotamya

Les attaques fascistes ne nous arrêteront pas !

Les victoires de l'avenir naîtront des luttes du passé. Vive la Commune de Paris !

Contra la opresión patriarcal y la explotación capitalista: ¡Ninguna está sola!

100 Years Since the Kronstadt Uprising: To Remember Means to Fight!

El Rei està nu. La deriva autoritària de l’estat espanyol

Agroecology and Organized Anarchism: An Interview With the Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro (FARJ)

Es Ley por la Lucha de Las de Abajo

Covid19 Değil Akp19 Yasakları: 14 Maddede Akp19 Krizi

Declaración conjunta internacionalista por la libertad de las y los presos politicos de la revuelta social de la región chilena

[Perú] Crónica de una vacancia anunciada o disputa interburguesa en Perú

Nigeria and the Hope of the #EndSARS Protests

© 2005-2021 Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by [ Disclaimer | Privacy ]