Wildcat Teachers strike Day 2 in British Columbia
north america / mexico |
workplace struggles |
news report
Monday October 17, 2005 19:32 by unknown - NAF
42,000 teachers on strike in Canada
Over 42,000 teachers held the course on the picket line for the second school day as momentum and support for the strike continues to build across British Columbia. Code. Support for the strike remains strong throughout the province, with both the Government and BCTF digging in their heels for a show down that could determine the future of the public education system and collective bargaining in the province.
Wildcat Teachers' Strike Finishes Second Day
Over 42,000 teachers held the course on the picket line for the
second school day as momentum and support for the strike continues to
build across the province. Despite a holiday weekend Supreme Court
injunction ruling against the British Columbia Teachers Federation,
recent polls indicate over half of the Province supports what is
essentially an illegal strike, while highest projections of
government support range in the teens.
Rallies coordinated by the BC Federation of Labour and supported
by a diverse area of union, community, and political organizations
were seen in over 16 major communities across the province. While the
leadership of the largest trade unions continues to publicly praise
the New Democratic Party of BC, the party continued to urge workers
to obey legislation ordering them back to work. Many at the rallies
called for escalation of picket support and alluded to the
possibility of broader strike action.
The teachers, broadly considered a more conservative white-collar
union, are showing increasing militancy. They have publicly defied
the back-to-work legislation, and now refer to their wildcat strike
as an act of "civil disobedience". The leader of the BCTF responded
to the court injunction with a public statement beginning with "...We
are sorry to hear that the court has found that our actions are in
contempt of court...". In her ruling, the provincial Supreme Court
justice who issued the injunction against the BCTF stated "No citizen
or group of citizens may choose which orders they may obey".
42,000 Teachers on Strike in BC!!
The British Columbia Teacher's Federation went out on strike
Friday, bringing over 42,000 of their members onto the picket line in
an action deemed illegal by the Labour Relations Board and
strike-busting legislation brought in by the BC Government. The
indefinite strike means 600,000 students are out of classes, as the
province's elementary and secondary schools closed.
Public sector unions working in education-related fields have
vowed to support the BCTF. Over 25,000 Canadian Union of Public
Employees support workers, and numerous other workers from unions
such as the BCGEU, are refusing to cross the picket lines.
The wildcat strike, being declared as a political protest by some
within the union, comes after the Government's representatives
effectively refused to collectively bargain with the union. In
September, teachers voted 88.4% in favour of a strike mandate. The
Government's response on Monday was to introduce Bill 12 - a piece of
legislation forcing teachers back to work under the same conditions
for a year without negotiation.
In the face of draconian measures making any strike by the BCTF an
illegal act, the teachers voted 90.5% in favour of strike action on a
second vote on Wednesday. On Friday, teachers flooded the picket
lines as political activists, students, unionists, and members of the
community came out in force to support the strike. Public reaction
has so far been strongly in support of the strike.
The Teachers are demanding a return to collective bargaining
rights in the province, and their fight is one of demanding
fundamental rights to freedom of association through unions. Their
chief bargaining demand is reduced class sizes and the restoration of
services to students that have been cut by the Government. They are
also demanding an increase in wages, while the Government has clearly
stated they want no increases, meaning the value of wages will
actually fall in the face of cost-of-living increases.
A History of Strike Breaking
The dominant political party in BC, the BC Liberals led by Gordon
Campbell, has a history of strike breaking and aggressive
privatization of public assets. In April and May of 2004, the
Campbell government imposed a 14% pay cut and massive privatization
on the Hospital Employee's Union, triggering wildcat sympathy strikes
throughout the province. Although the HEU strike was eventually put
down through a controversial deal orchestrated with the trade union
bureaucracy, resentment towards government remains high across the
province.
While the BCTF's strike is about freedom of association and
collective bargaining, it is also a fight over the future direction
of the public education system. The core demands of the teachers
revolve around restoration of student services and the reduction of
class sizes. There is also the question of privatization, as the
Government has pursued and aggressive policy of privatization and
union-busting throughout the public sector. There are strong
indications the government may move towards privatizing elements of
the public education system if they are able to win in their fight
against the teachers.
Political Response
The New Democratic Party led by Carol James, currently the
opposition party to the BC Liberals in the provincial legislature, is
currently seen by many as the chief political opposition to the
Government's policies. However, during the 90's t he NDP majority
government steamrolled over the BCTF during two consecutive terms.
While the NDP seeks to gain political mileage from the conflict by
publicly issuing statements of support for the teachers, they have
refused to concretely support the illegal strike. Carol James, the
leader of the party, has indicated the teachers should "obey the law"
when it comes to defying back-to-work legislation imposed by the
government.
There is also skepticism over the role of the BC Federation of
Labour, who have recently stepped into negotiations with the
government over the dispute. While the BCFed backs the BCTF, many
working people remember the BCTF's sellout of the HEU strikers in May
of 2004. The BCFed's refusal to organized resistance to the assault
on trade unionism pushed by the government in 2002 also puts in doubt
the bureaucracy's commitment to supporting the strikers.
While the Campbell government calls for strikers to "return to
work" and for "respect for the rule of law", they are increasingly
facing accusations of unfairly applying the law. In the case of Telus
workers who have been on strike against the private-sector
telecommunications company for weeks, the government and courts have
consistently refused to punish corporate management for using
replacement workers in clear violation of the Labour Relations Code.
Support for the strike remains strong throughout the province, with
both the Government and BCTF digging in their heels for a show down
that could determine the future of the public education system and
collective bargaining in the province.
From the Web page of the
Northwest Anarchist
Federation
See also
42,000
BC Teachers in Illegal Strike
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 1 2The strike is illegal, but it's not a "wildcat strike" because it has official union authorization.
Here's the section on wildcat strikes at Wikipedia:
"Most strikes involve actions by labor unions during collective bargaining with an employer. Generally, such actions are rare: 98% of union contracts are settled without a strike. Occasionally, workers decide to strike without the sanction of a labor union, either because the union refuses to endorse such a tactic, or because the workers concerned are not unionized. Such strikes are often described as unofficial. Strikes without formal union authorization are also known as wildcat strikes."
Telus falls under federal law, so its actually legal for them to use replacement workers.
The government isn't necessarily "union-busting", since it's useful for the government to have the BCFed police key industries (health care, education, etc.) When the truckers went on strike earlier this year, the government wasn't able to legislate them back to work because they aren't unionized. The government may just be happy to drive down worker's wages and working conditions, through privatization and other measures, while maintaining unionization to limit workers' response.
Collective bargaining is "collective" in name only. In reality it is union bargaining committee to government and/or corporation bargaining, which the rank-and-file is not a part of aside from voting. In some cases, the membership doesn't even get to vote on the agreement, as was the case with the BCFed/HEU-Liberal collaboration of May 2004.
Your comment reads incorrectly:
While the BCFed backs the BCTF, many working people remember the BCTF's sellout of the HEU strikers in May of 2004.
The BCTF (teachers' federation) supported the HEU strikers in May 2004 and in fact joined them on the picket lines. It was the BCFed who brokered a deal many saw as unfortunate.